Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
You could dl the DNG Converter, transform the .ORFs into .DNGs and use them with Aperture. I just tested and Aperture will import them that way. Color default seems to be ok, if not stupendous.I have LR5, but I just don't want to use it!
Thanks so much for this GodfreyYou could dl the DNG Converter, transform the .ORFs into .DNGs and use them with Aperture. I just tested and Aperture will import them that way. Color default seems to be ok, if not stupendous.
G
Sadly Godfrey it will only import files from 4/3 lenses as far as I can see. With micro 43 lenses you get Unsupported file format.You could dl the DNG Converter, transform the .ORFs into .DNGs and use them with Aperture. I just tested and Aperture will import them that way. Color default seems to be ok, if not stupendous.
G
You are correct. The files I used to test were made with the 11-22 and 35 Macro, they import without any problems. The DNGBackwardVersion token in them is v1.1.0. Another test file I made with the Summilux-DG 25 has DNGBackwardVersion v1.3.0, it will not import. When I tweak the EXIF to reflect v1.1.0, they import.Sadly Godfrey it will only import files from 4/3 lenses as far as I can see. With micro 43 lenses you get Unsupported file format.
Hmm - what do you use to tweak the exif information? I guess this means that until there is proper support in Aperture I'll be shooting the 11-22 and the 12-60 (which is not much of a hardship!)You are correct. The files I used to test were made with the 11-22 and 35 Macro, they import without any problems. The DNGBackwardVersion token in them is v1.1.0. Another test file I made with the Summilux-DG 25 has DNGBackwardVersion v1.3.0, it will not import. When I tweak the EXIF to reflect v1.1.0, they import.
Hmmm - yes - I rather understood this was underway when the monochrom supported, but I had realised that it wasn't (X-Vario DNG files don't work either).That means that Aperture as yet cannot interpret DNG files that it doesn't have a camera profile for with DNG versions that include lens-injected correction parameters.
I won't express further my feelings on that subject. Lightroom 5.2 doesn't have the best color profiles for the E-M1 as yet, but at least it supports the version of DNG that was current in 2009 ..!
G
HI BartThese are looking good and a lovely lens no doubt.
Still, I don't get it why you had to flung it across the road first ... :loco:
But joking aside - good it was mendable and who knows when (ever) I receive my free MMF-3 adapter ...
Kind regards.
Going fearlessly into the mish-mash of computer goofyness, I used a disk editor to bash the files directly. It was quickest, and I didn't have a compatible version of EXIFtool installed.Hmm - what do you use to tweak the exif information? I guess this means that until there is proper support in Aperture I'll be shooting the 11-22 and the 12-60 (which is not much of a hardship!)
I missed the 12-60 lens damage story. You live dangerously. ;-)HI Bart
Actually it was a dog bolt - I had the camera in hand, and the dog on the lead . . . she bolted for it and the camera spun away onto the road
Still - it's been all nicely fixed and checked, and seems to be doing well. The only visible damage is the deep scarring on the lens hood.