Hi fellas,
This my first post and (as usual) I'm going to start with a doubt. I've been digging deep into this forum and several other sources of information but whenever I'm about to make up my mind about one camera I bump into an article/photos about the other. this is really hard and I feel that I cannot go wrong with either, but nonetheless I'm having the worst time deciding. I do a lot of street/landscape photography and I want something really fast and reliable. Right now I have the new Nikon P6000 and I have to say I'm a bit disappointed with it. Don't get me wrong. When you have the time to set up the shot carefully you can get great photos, but when you need to "point and shoot" I don't trust this camera at all...the white balance is horrible when it comes to tungsten, the autofocus is slow and not trust worthy, the raw takes about 2,5 secs, the "live view" cannot be trusted (even with time to set up a shot, when it looks absolutely perfect it can come out looking nothing like what you've just seen on the lcd). Anyway, right now I've got a great deal on a GX100 and I really want to go for it, but the LX3's 16/9, f2.0, 1cm macro really has me crazy. Price wise I can get the GX100 100€ cheaper than the LX3. So, any thoughts?
thanks in advance,
Rafa