I had one of the first X1Ds in the US Back in 2017. I know very well about the flaws in the launch of that product and, IMO, it was far more about the major instability issues than the lack of “features.” The actual shipment of the X1D was constantly delayed from the time of the announcement in 2016. Then, when it was finally released in 2017, the X1Ds were regularly freezing, the AF was slow and unreliable, the control wheels had to be replaced, the start up time was dreadfully slow, and on and on. If the X2D is rock solid in operating the way it should with just the features promised/listed at launch, I think it will be an extraordinary camera system for many. Not all. If there are missing “features” that you really do NEED, you should not buy it unless and until they are available.
I expect that the percentage of the potential buyers of an X2D who would actually use video is extremely small, and given the apparent challenges of incorporating a serious video capability in the X2D, I think the decision to drop it was correct. It just may not have been possible to solve the overheating issues without a significant change in the size or design of the body. That would have been so much more of an issue than dropping video. How much of the delay in releasing the X2D was because they were trying to make video work? Moreover, how much time and effort in writing software/firmware would have to be spent on video rather than on improving the software/firmware for still photography? Again, a bad trade off. Ind, nobody was ever promised video, so nobody should see that as a marketing failure on Hasselblad’s part.
I expect that the percentage of the potential buyers of an X2D who would actually use video is extremely small, and given the apparent challenges of incorporating a serious video capability in the X2D, I think the decision to drop it was correct. It just may not have been possible to solve the overheating issues without a significant change in the size or design of the body. That would have been so much more of an issue than dropping video. How much of the delay in releasing the X2D was because they were trying to make video work? Moreover, how much time and effort in writing software/firmware would have to be spent on video rather than on improving the software/firmware for still photography? Again, a bad trade off. Ind, nobody was ever promised video, so nobody should see that as a marketing failure on Hasselblad’s part.