jonoslack
Active member
I think that most of these were taken with a NEX 5n and an A77 . . but the exif is there, so you can shoot me down in flames if I'm wrong!
Snapshots from Suffolk in November
Snapshots from Suffolk in November
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
I'll bet you double checked the EXIF before you put that down ... :angel:I think that most of these were taken with a NEX 5n and an A77 . . but the exif is there, so you can shoot me down in flames if I'm wrong!
HI BobJono,
As always you have made the best of what looks like some wonderful light.
The A77 seems to shine ... lovely color and DR.
Bob
Didn't give you a thought Bart :ROTFL:I'll bet you double checked the EXIF before you put that down ... :angel:
:grin: :ROTFL:
Thank you - It's not such a grand ambition (making good images out of simple subjects) - but it seems to be one we share (and which you are so expert). Which makes the praise even more welcome.A lovely 'organic' series with some new additions I hadn't noticed before.
Always a pleasure seeing what you can do with simple subjects, just wonderful :salute:
All the very best.
Thanks for the kind words.Splendid shots Jono. And a delicious showcase for ZA optics (particularly those shot with the ZA 135 f1.8).
Curious, while I know little has been written about shooting with the ZA 24mm f1.7 Sonnar E lens (due to it's utter lack of availability) care to venture a guess as to whether a ZA lens on the A77 (or A65) would yield superior images than say an E ZA on a NEX (particularly the NEX 7)?
I think too much is written about the pellicle - clearly it has an effect on high ISO simply by reducing the light, but beyond that I'm doubtful - AA filters are right up against the sensor - and will therefore have much more direct effect on the image - the pellicle is further away, and should have a smaller effect (like shooting through a clean window at wide aperture).One's got a pellicle. The other has nothing standing in the way between glass and sensor (other than an anti-aliasing filter). Reports suggest typical E lenses don't seem to be quite the equivalent of their FF Alpha brethren so would it be a trade-off?
Or do you think it would be about equal. (Or too soon to truly tell.)
Thanks
Peter
Thank you! It's the simple things which are around me most of the time (aren't I lucky). Still, there's not much opportunity for street photography in our neck of the woods!It's always nice when you put up a link to recent work. Lovely images, which show the love for the simple things in life.
Hi TerryThe rose on page one is my fave! but number 11 bridle? is pretty close behind.