pellicle
New member
Jose
particularly your method of :
is a good approach. I had toyed with the thought of this but not gotten around to it. I like it a lot!
BTW I think that when shooting in tungsten light that application of filters on Digital Cameras is just as 80A filtration works quite well in assisting the digital capture. While colour balancing of the image can be done by the camera if you follow the expose right principle why not attempt to even up all the channels to maximize your capture in all 3?
For example examine the difference between the Green and Red channel noise in JPG's on this page. Scroll about half way down, it uses javascript to swap out images ... and may take a minute to load as the server is slow.
did you ever compare the 4x5's scanned at 1200dpi on a flatbed scanner such as the epson? In theory that would yeild nearly the same pixels as your 1Ds camera does (certainly 2200dpi more if needed for big prints).
but I think I'll try filtration on my flatbed and post my results
especially a drum scanner with all that wet mounting rigmarole I'm sure ;-)I did a comparison with my drum scanner and I opted for the camera as a scanner, it gives me the same quality and much less work than using the drum scanner.
particularly your method of :
Color negatives gave me some headaches till I resorted to filter the light source ... done with CC filters
is a good approach. I had toyed with the thought of this but not gotten around to it. I like it a lot!
BTW I think that when shooting in tungsten light that application of filters on Digital Cameras is just as 80A filtration works quite well in assisting the digital capture. While colour balancing of the image can be done by the camera if you follow the expose right principle why not attempt to even up all the channels to maximize your capture in all 3?
For example examine the difference between the Green and Red channel noise in JPG's on this page. Scroll about half way down, it uses javascript to swap out images ... and may take a minute to load as the server is slow.
did you ever compare the 4x5's scanned at 1200dpi on a flatbed scanner such as the epson? In theory that would yeild nearly the same pixels as your 1Ds camera does (certainly 2200dpi more if needed for big prints).
but I think I'll try filtration on my flatbed and post my results