Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
If you are prepared to spend good money then why on earth would you read anything at PZ ...this is what is referred to as the classic oxymoron.Over at Photozone, he does very thorough testing, and he was not happy with the performance. A dirct quote from his site:
Didn't mean to step on anyone's toes , if I offended anyone, I appologize. When I read Michael Reichman's review of the D800, he referred to PZ's tests for every lens he purchased for his kit (possibly 8 or 10 lenses). Since i respect Michael's judgement, I assumed PZ did reliable testing.If you are prepared to spend good money then why on earth would you read anything at PZ ...this is what is referred to as the classic oxymoron.
Anyone that relies on the information from there is a poor source of anything on the forums. Its well known to the Zeiss community that it was the review and not the lens that was a dud (another dud).
not vitriol but they they perpetuate the absurdity and even now we have lenses and camera bodies scored out of ...what is it 10? How on earth do they know what my 10 is? How is anyone going to be happy with a 5/10Not sure why the vitriol against PZ and other sites is necessary. While I can comment on the ZF 25mm
ummmm, you're kidding right?I did test a new ZF 21mm f2.8 on the 800E and found it stellar in the centre and dreedfully soft onthe edges, leading me to think it is not a flat field lens. A most surprising result.