Site Sponsors
Results 1 to 47 of 47

Thread: Getting tired of Diglloyd

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    413
    Post Thanks / Like

    Getting tired of Diglloyd

    I know Mr. Chambers is a thorough and knowledgeable reviewer, but as of late he seems to have an extra large ax to grind with Leica. Most of his reviews of Leica products are quite negative.

    He just tested a Leica S and encountered AF problems. Incidentally, he also reported AF problems in his original S2 review. I've used my S2-P for 2,5 years now and like most other S system owners, I can confirm that AF is very, very accurate.

    If he has these AF errors, assuming Mr. Chambers knows how to operate the camera, he has a faulty camera and he should not publish a review that hurts Leica. I understand he's not pleased because he feels his valuable time was wasted, but that doesn't mean he should bad-mouth a complete system like this.

    I had planned to become a subscriber again, just to read his thoughts on the S system, but I guess I'll hold off for now.

  2. #2
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Quote Originally Posted by peterv View Post
    I know Mr. Chambers is a thorough and knowledgeable reviewer, but as of late he seems to have an extra large ax to grind with Leica. Most of his reviews of Leica products are quite negative.

    He just tested a Leica S and encountered AF problems. Incidentally, he also reported AF problems in his original S2 review. I've used my S2-P for 2,5 years now and like most other S system owners, I can confirm that AF is very, very accurate.

    If he has these AF errors, assuming Mr. Chambers knows how to operate the camera, he has a faulty camera and he should not publish a review that hurts Leica. I understand he's not pleased because he feels his valuable time was wasted, but that doesn't mean he should bad-mouth a complete system like this.

    I had planned to become a subscriber again, just to read his thoughts on the S system, but I guess I'll hold off for now.
    I think he is a very academic tester.
    When he wrote about the AF problems with the S2 I wrote him that my S2 was focusing very consistent. He didn't really accept another truth than his truth.
    I still sometimes read his reviews, but from my experience with various products one has to know that his findings do not always reflect real life use of those products.
    The other thing is he is focusing way too much (IMO) on small negative aspects instead of giving a full picture about a product.

  3. #3
    Workshop Member glenerrolrd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Jupiter FL/Atlanta GA
    Posts
    2,279
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Its a shame that lloyd allows his emotions to get the better of him ...especially on his blog posts . His actual tests are quite good and almost always reflect a careful and methodical process. Its his rants that undermine his credibility .

    I ve had an S2 since they were released and now have in addition the S 006 ...plus most all the S lenses. In my experience the S produced .....my favorite IQ over any other system . The combination of IQ and aesthetic that is most pleasing to me . In addition the S has a form that allows for a wide range of uses ..its a joy to use .

    AF is precise ...if you have a well defined “target” it will just nail it most every time . It is however not always accurate because it has a fairly large focus point (inside the focus circle) and can be fooled by a lack of a clearly defined high contrast edge . The more you use it the better you become at placing the focus point .

    If something inside the focus point has a high contrast edge (but is not the target ) you will get a “precise “ focus on the edge . Fortunately the S2/S has a terrific bright screen and I can see the point of focus ...so when I m on a tripod ....I will make manual adjustments to place it where I need it .

    If you look at the test conditions used by lloyd ....not hard to see that the AF could struggle depending on where you place the focus point . If you can t see well enough to focus manually ..he has a valid point for some situations .

    The play back on the LCD is not up to modern standards ....my daughter has the Canon 5DS R and simple one button play back zooms in on the actual focus point . Even the new LCD on the “Q” provides much better feedback and of course the S2/S does not support Live View .

    Yet when I shoot landscape ....I am always at F11 -F16 so I hardly miss focus at all . And when I am finished I have files that are superb by any standard .
    Roger Dunham
    http://rogerdunham.com/
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  4. #4
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    you can fool most cameras AF.
    I find the S AF works very accurate and incase when it is irritated you can see it in the viewfinder.
    I use the lenses wide open often and get pretty reliable results.
    The great thing is one doesnt have to do micro adjustment for the lenses like one has to with Canon/Nikon/Pentax.

    Its ok if Loyd points out eventual problems, he just makes them bigger than they are sometimes. And it would be sad if people dont buy/use a great product just because they take reviews like Loyds too serious.

  5. #5
    Senior Member atanabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Napa Valley, CA
    Posts
    470
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    I guess the moral of the story is that you need to test your gear before you are out in the field. If the AF was misbehaving, it should have been noted while in the comfort of civilization and taken care of. I can feel for his angst after hiking with a heavy backpack only to find that his gear is not working up to his standards.

    I have had issues with AF on my S2 but after bringing it to Leica's attention, all of my lenses and body were sent back for calibration, a loaner system sent to me for the duration and all at no charge to me. The main thing is that I did not wait for an important trip to test my equipment performance. Yes, for the price it should be perfect, but this is the real world things happen.
    Al Tanabe my website https://www.altanabe.com

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    311
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Does your experience with the camera get worse if Lloyd Chambers doesn't have the same experience?

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Scottish empty lands
    Posts
    33
    Post Thanks / Like
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

  8. #8
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Quote Originally Posted by Speedgraphic View Post
    Does your experience with the camera get worse if Lloyd Chambers doesn't have the same experience?
    Of course not, but it can be misleading to people who try to make a choice.
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    71
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    He hates the camera so much that I should offer to take it off his hands for a $1K or so.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    413
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Exactly why I said it gets tiresome. Thanks for digging these up and making my point!

    I used to be a subscriber, but stopped a few years ago because I have no need for his reviews. I like to read his blog, though lately the anti-Leica campaign seems to have reached a new peak.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    413
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Quote Originally Posted by Paratom View Post
    Of course not, but it can be misleading to people who try to make a choice.
    Precisely Tom! And it's also not in the interest of this outstanding system as a whole. There's no need for negative publicity. I believe the system is on a threshold at the moment.

  12. #12
    Workshop Member glenerrolrd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Jupiter FL/Atlanta GA
    Posts
    2,279
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Given that Lloyd has an “attitude problem” and clearly doesn t appreciate Leica . Many of his frustrations are real ...I use all the gear he talks about . Honestly I have not picked up a single Leica camera since the M8 that didn t require some effort and too many required trips to the factory . As Al pointed out ..you have to plan for it .

    When I took out my brand new S24 and tried to use it on my S 006 (also new) ...no AF . Keep in mind I use an S2 . Turned out to be a setting I didn t understand ...rear AF button is part of “Manual Focus” . Once I corrected the settings ...all was perfect again . I was definitely unhappy as I was in the Everglades . But I had my S2 and by noon I figured it out (by emailing my friends at the Leica Store Miami ) . So a little pre shoot familiarization can go a long way to keep things going smoothly .

    One good question for lloyd should be ......why didn t you verify the focus using the screen . The S has a much larger,brighter and all around better screen than his D810 . How can he focus a OTUS at F1.4 with a standard D810 screen if he can t see focus on an S ?

    I also have the Nikon D810 ,Leica R lenses and the Zeiss OTUS . While you can get terrific results with either system.....the Leica S consistently produces brilliant files that require modest amounts of post processing . The presets I obtained from David Farkes at LSM produce a wonderful aesthetic . This is using the embedded profile provided by the camera in Lightroom . This is not at all my experience with the D810 ....you can get there but it requires a higher level of post processing skill . In the end I prefer the Leica files .....

    The Nikon s will come and go as technology advances but I am pretty darn happy with the S system . Don t be put off by lloyd s frustrations its a terrific system .
    Roger Dunham
    http://rogerdunham.com/
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  13. #13
    Senior Member atanabe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Napa Valley, CA
    Posts
    470
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Quote Originally Posted by glenerrolrd View Post
    ... In the end I prefer the Leica files .....

    The Nikon s will come and go as technology advances but I am pretty darn happy with the S system . Don t be put off by lloyd s frustrations its a terrific system .
    At one point I considered ditching the S and moving on, after looking at the options out there decided to keep it . . . the files I get from the S kept pulling me back.
    Al Tanabe my website https://www.altanabe.com
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  14. #14
    Workshop Member ptomsu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Austria, close to Vienna
    Posts
    3,867
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Maybe he hates Leica, maybe not - I do not know!

    BUT I already stopped subscribing to his reviews years ago, as I found most of them not helpful anyway. Plus I expresses this concern already here in this forum at least once!

    Anyway, no one is forced to subscribe to such sites.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Scottsdale AZ USA
    Posts
    119
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    http://diglloyd.com/blog/2015/201507...sCoupling.html

    This one in particular is quite galling. He freaks out, labels the Q a POS, then calls his error a 'confusing twist'.

    Arrogant in the extreme.
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  16. #16
    Senior Member stephengilbert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Santa Monica, CA
    Posts
    2,272
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    I loved the over the top drama of the Q report, And, of course, the arrogance: "Look, if you’re a street shooter walking out of your hotel or whatever and then back to a dinner and coffee, maybe the Q works for you." But if you're an intrepid risk taker such as moi, better use something else.

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    523
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    His approach seems to be one of 'ego first'. From that one can make one's own assessment of objectivity.

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    475
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Quote Originally Posted by glenerrolrd View Post
    Honestly I have not picked up a single Leica camera since the M8 that didn t require some effort and too many required trips to the factory . As Al pointed out ..you have to plan for it .
    That is absolutely amazing.

    The computer age has certainly destroyed our expectations of quality.

    Problems used to be the domain of second-rate products sold through bargain-basement outlets.
    Now it's the norm because all products are second-rate, sold through bargain-basement outlets.

    It is NEVER acceptable for any new product to require factory service for any reason... period.

    - Leigh

  19. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    192
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    I had not read this before and was blissfully unaware of Diglloyd. I can definitely see that he writes brutal reviews and seems to have a particular animus towards Leica. I wonder why he bothers using and reviewing products that invariably fail him?

    There is of course a kernel (if not a loaf) of truth in his rants. But I must side with those who challenge his writings. All he writes about is probably true as far as his experience goes. The problem I see is that he singles out certain products to castigate mercilessly while ignoring all the other competitive products which have many issues equally troublesome.

    I bought a used M240 and might have experience a minor hang up or 2 but nothing like he writes about. If I read his reviews before buying the M240, I would have run from it and lost the wonderful experience of owning and using this fine camera. If this person has influence over people, he is denying them the opportunity to enjoy the good aspects of the products he bashes without offering suitable alternatives.

    It's kind of sad actually to basically see enshrined in credibility the rants of of someone who could easily be a troll in any of a number of photography/camera forums. Yes, Leica and other brands do not make perfect products and there defects in operating systems and hardware which need correction. But it's not fair to run all these real issues with subjective opinions on the design and intent of the products.

    While I am not an expert scientist or world known photographer, I don't see even a portion of the criticisms about things like button placement and menu organization to be too annoying if I just read the users manual or ask others for help. As far as AF failures, lock ups, etc. Every other digital camera I've used has had them... These issues are not unique and calling the M240 a piece of **** is really pretty extreme. Diglloyd comes across as a bomb thrower and a troll, regardless of his credentials.

  20. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    192
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Quote Originally Posted by Leigh View Post
    That is absolutely amazing.

    The computer age has certainly destroyed our expectations of quality.

    Problems used to be the domain of second-rate products sold through bargain-basement outlets.
    Now it's the norm because all products are second-rate, sold through bargain-basement outlets.

    It is NEVER acceptable for any new product to require factory service for any reason... period.

    - Leigh
    I totally agree with you on principle. However, the world does not operate in such a way any more. The fast paced progress in technology and science coupled with the tremendous competition to get "new" products to market make it impossible to produce extremely complicated products perfectly reliable.
    For instance, there is a huge difference between a purely mechanical, rather simple device as a film rangefinder camera and the digital rangefinders of today. It's perfectly possible to design and execute a brilliant film camera that will function perfectly out of the box. That is relatively easy to accomplish. OTOH, the digital cameras are far more complex and delicate mechanically and contain very complex electronic parts and very complicated programs to make the images. All this needs far more time to perfect than the companies can afford to spend. By the time they get a "perfect" product, it would be hopelessly obsolete.

    This is why the spaceships, ballistic missiles, nuclear submarines and many other very critical systems are still using the most reliable, tried and true computers older than the ancient 80386.

  21. #21
    Senior Member barjohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Galveston, TX
    Posts
    947
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    171

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    I can't comment on the S series AF as I have never owned one; however, I can comment on Leica's AF attempts in other cameras, notably the XV, T and Q having owned or owning all of them at one time or another. I found the XV and the T to suffer from two AF issues, slow speed and sufficiently frequent AF error to rate those as unacceptable. By AF error, I mean that the camera indicated it had focus lock but the resulting image was out of focus. Because I often shoot with review turned off and do not chimp at the time I am shooting, it was irritating and disappointing to later discovered the image was lost due to mis-focus. The Q is the first Leica with AF that I have owned that gets AF right. It is fast in virtually most conditions including pretty low light and it rarely misses. It's AF matches or exceeds the very fast and accurate AF of the M43 cameras such as the Olympus OM-D EM-5II or other equivalent Panasonic models. The prior implementations were too slow for moving subjects and prone to a strange bug where the camera would indicate focus but nothing was in focus. A dive into the EXIF data would show the camera selected a far distance focus or an extreme closeup distance to place the AF and there was nothing in either area that was high contrast to fool the AF system.
    V/r John

  22. #22
    Senior Member Amin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Boston, MA (USA)
    Posts
    1,809
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    I think it's just his schtick. Some do the overexuberant, love almost everything schtick. Others do the grouchy thing. Not too many reviewers take the middle road, probably because it tends to make for less interesting reading.

    I've been struggling with some of this myself as I post tests and reviews here and there on the web. If anything, I have trouble communicating my exuberance even when I am really psyched about a lens.

    Just thinking out loud, here. For whatever reason, Lloyd's "anti-Leica" moments have never bothered me.
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  23. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    475
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Quote Originally Posted by silver92b View Post
    For instance, there is a huge difference between a purely mechanical, rather simple device as a film rangefinder camera and the digital rangefinders of today. It's perfectly possible to design and execute a brilliant film camera that will function perfectly out of the box. That is relatively easy to accomplish. OTOH, the digital cameras are far more complex and delicate mechanically and contain very complex electronic parts and very complicated programs to make the images.
    I wrote all of the guidance and control software for the three-stage Pegasus rocket.
    Somewhat more complex than a camera.

    That s/w functioned perfectly from day 1, with not even one malfunction in many launches over its entire ten year life.

    It can be done. It's not any more difficult that writing junk-ware.

    The problem is that modern engineers aren't taught how to do it in the first place.
    They're told to get something out the door as quickly as possible, and we'll fix it later.

    - Leigh
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  24. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Czech Republic and Austria
    Posts
    305
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    52

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    I've been shooting in a workshop with a famous European photographer for the past few days, using my S2 alongside my M. And yes, I have missed a few shots because of the slow buffer on the S2 and a few because of not refocusing quickly enough....but....when I open the S2 files on the screen I say to the S2 "I still love you....". Mr. Digilloyd may be "right" on some counts but it hasn't prevented me from taking nice pictures.
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

  25. #25
    Senior Member barjohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Galveston, TX
    Posts
    947
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    171

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Leigh's comment reminded me of the testing we used to do for space born computers/software back in the 70's and 80's. If it failed a single test it was discarded. The concept was simple. We could not repair it if it failed; so it had to have a high reliability assurance. Granted, it costs more to develop to extremely high standards but would you like the Leica approach if it controlled the trigger mechanism for a nuclear weapon? :thumb down:

    I would agree that Lloyd is a bit of an egomaniac and is he ever difficult to correspond with if you disagree with him, but his testing and his resulting examples do show that he knows what he is talking about much of the time. The problem is when he is wrong he never quite fully acknowledges it. Maybe not much different than most of us, come to think about it. He just has a bigger megaphone.
    V/r John

  26. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    192
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Quote Originally Posted by barjohn View Post
    Leigh's comment reminded me of the testing we used to do for space born computers/software back in the 70's and 80's. If it failed a single test it was discarded. The concept was simple. We could not repair it if it failed; so it had to have a high reliability assurance. Granted, it costs more to develop to extremely high standards but would you like the Leica approach if it controlled the trigger mechanism for a nuclear weapon? :thumb down:

    I would agree that Lloyd is a bit of an egomaniac and is he ever difficult to correspond with if you disagree with him, but his testing and his resulting examples do show that he knows what he is talking about much of the time. The problem is when he is wrong he never quite fully acknowledges it. Maybe not much different than most of us, come to think about it. He just has a bigger megaphone.
    You and Leigh are the exception rather than the rule. I've had been a mechanical design engineer for many years and worked decades along programmers before I retired. Those guys were not stupid, lazy or incompetent, but the truth is that all the programming needed constant and continuous upgrading and debugging. I won't go into details, but we worked on machines and systems for all sorts of material handling. All custom made practically one-off. I worked in several different companies doing a variety of work. Back in the dawn of time, I even worked for a company that made ejection seats (as an illustrator, tech writer). I can promise you that with the best efforts of hard working people and a great deal at stake, malfunctions still happened.... I think that consumer product manufacturers are under great pressure to get things done too fast. There is never enough time to do it right but plenty of time to do it 2 or 3 times :thumb down: It's not only cameras that suffer from these issues, but every consumer item including cars, appliances, etc.

  27. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    673
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    I wrote something longer and then erased it.

    Bottom line, Leica needs to clean up their acts. Lloyd needs to manage his expectations


    Though I will add I understand his frustration. I think the more you appreciate Leica's quality, the more you want them to do better! And the more frustrated you get when they fail you.


    My first S006 was a glitchy camera, a HUGE hassle and a lot of fighting to get it replaced (was then replaced by a used beat up camera) and it took a lot more fighting to get that one replaced with a new one *(as per my warranty platinum swap). At the same time, lens was DOA, brand new from factory. Replacing it was also a hassle. And I had to fight with Leica and the dealer network over shipping and etc.
    Still love the S-006, and wish it was a better camera as I enjoy using it.. But I'm willing to learn how to manoeuvre it's shortcomings so I can use it and enjoy it. Rather then bitching about it, and giving up on it. All in all, I feel my frustrations with the system were worth it in the end, because I enjoy the S-006 now, and look forward to seeing what the S-007 can deliver!

  28. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    475
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Quote Originally Posted by silver92b View Post
    There is never enough time to do it right but plenty of time to do it 2 or 3 times :thumb down:
    And therein lies the fallacy that so many companies follow.
    Doing it right in the first place takes less time than doing a half-a$$ job.

    A good 50% or more of most software projects is taken up by testing and debugging.
    If you don't put bugs in initially, you don't have to waste that time finding and correcting them.

    It's entirely mindset. Those who understand that are the super-heros.

    Quote Originally Posted by silver92b View Post
    It's not only cameras that suffer from these issues, but every consumer item including cars, appliances, etc.
    That is unfortunately true, when it doesn't need to be.

    - Leigh
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  29. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    311
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    My overall point was, Digilloyd has a tiny audience because you have to pay to read his rambling tests. The same person who has the money and is seriously considering an S purchase is NOT going to be basing that decision on Digilloyds problems with the camera. If you like your camera, who cares what Digilloyd says about it? Thank you lucky stars you got to enjoy it. The guy who runs Leica Rumors thinks that Leica might abandon the 007 completely. They SAY it's set for a fall release, but that's a year late. I don't think they're going to add users with this model, especially at their "Non-Lion-Shooting Dentist only" price structure. That would be a great ad BTW. A picture of a great Leica S with a telephoto and text that says "This is How You Shoot a Lion."

    I do like that he tells it like it is with Leica though. Details matter in a product this expensive. I won't go as far as Leigh by saying that no product should ever have problems, because if you've ever spent a single day in the Universe we all share, you'll understand that sh*t happens. I don't fault them for that too hard. But some issues are built in! Why did the monochrom have that terrible screen? I know it's not hip to say this but that ruined the product for me. I want to check focus quickly an accurately, and since the camera was 8 grand, I want to know my 8 grand went to top tier components. I'm sorry but during the M9 and Original MM years, those cameras were built from off the shelf, aging and cheap components, and then sold at a premium. The screen was the same as the one in the Nikon D80 and the sensor was the same one that Kodak had been producing for years already. Tech gets cheaper over time. They're still selling that stuff with the M-E! The 240, MM2, and Q are signs of good things to come. But don't get all upset that somebody is calling Leica out. They deserved it.

    If the S continues they'll have to lower the price IMO. Pro's can afford it but why would they bother? No loaner bodies for failures and nice as they are, the offerings from Phase, Hassy, and Pentax cover the market with bigger sensors, better support, and lenses that nobody is seriously complaining about. The Leica S COULD be THE high end wedding photographer camera. I see it as nearly perfect for that application. But as a wedding photographer I would never invest that much money into something that is essentially a big question mark for reliability, and a big hurdle for any service that might come up.
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  30. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    590
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Quote Originally Posted by Leigh View Post
    And therein lies the fallacy that so many companies follow.
    Doing it right in the first place takes less time than doing a half-a$$ job.

    A good 50% or more of most software projects is taken up by testing and debugging.
    If you don't put bugs in initially, you don't have to waste that time finding and correcting them.

    It's entirely mindset. Those who understand that are the super-heros.


    That is unfortunately true, when it doesn't need to be.

    - Leigh
    When you watch Sony's lurching into the future, with the great aspects constantly hamstrung by silly caveats, like the cover glass, RAWs, general fragile build, bloating bodies, Leica does not look so bad LOL

    I think the Q can be seen as a direct Sony spanking. "This is what a whole camera looks like, boys"
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  31. #31
    Senior Member KeithL's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    832
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Getting tired of Diglloyd

    What's not to like, he's a measurbator's wet dream.

  32. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Reykjavik, Iceland
    Posts
    2,310
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    9

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Quote Originally Posted by Speedgraphic View Post

    If the S continues they'll have to lower the price IMO. Pro's can afford it but why would they bother? No loaner bodies for failures and nice as they are, the offerings from Phase, Hassy, and Pentax cover the market with bigger sensors, better support, and lenses that nobody is seriously complaining about. The Leica S COULD be THE high end wedding photographer camera. I see it as nearly perfect for that application. But as a wedding photographer I would never invest that much money into something that is essentially a big question mark for reliability, and a big hurdle for any service that might come up.
    I am curious where you get this about no loaner bodies, poor support and lenses that people complain about? My experience has been the complete opposite. I have had one major issue with an S camera, and it was my first S2. The AF was not properly calibrated out of the box. The camera was replaced. Since then, I have bought an S camera and a few lenses. I have had a few minor issues, but all have been resolved very easily and professionally. I have been offered a loaner camera for when the camera needed maintenance, and support direct from Leica has been phenomenal...I know the names of contacts at the factory and they remember me. I have not had that from any other manufacturer. In fact, it is nearly the exact opposite experience I have had with a certain other high end brand, which treated my problems from a place of skepticism, while racking up fees and then failing to solve issues. Leica has always listened and done their best to solve any issue and even waived fees and paid for shipping even outside of warranty if they felt the problem was from their end.

    I think the apparent higher propensity for issues with the Leica cameras has several main causes -- 1. They are lower volume products from a much smaller company than the other major companies, and since they have fewer people working on them, there is less man-power to address every conceivable problem. 2. Leica tends to push the limits of manufacturing tolerance in the lenses and bodies much higher than most manufacturers, so it is much more difficult to get everything to work together as perfectly. Since the lens performance is so high, it is easy to see any issues that might not be visible with lesser lenses. 3. Since they are so much more expensive than most, people hold them to a very high standard and complain loudly about any issue.

    As for Digilloyd, I have never bought his reviews, as it never seemed to make sense to me. His statements do sound shrill, and at least from my end I think that his problems are either from a particular issue with the camera or lens he tried or one of user error. I have used the S and S2 for several years now, and they are by far the most accurate AF cameras I have used, even if they are not very fast in focusing. I believe the AF system is a bit more complicated than it first appears, however, so it can benefit from tweaking a bit in particular scenarios. For example, I believe the AF system takes into account DOF in its calculations for optimum focus of wide angle lenses. For example, if I am using the 35mm or 45mm lenses to focus in a landscape composition with a field extending out before me with mountains in the distance, it tends to put the focus point such that infinity is within the hyperfocal distance of the lens at maximum aperture, rather than at true infinity. This maximizes sharpness over the entire picture, but sacrifices the absolute sharpness a bit at infinity. If you want the camera to truly prioritize infinity, it is better to make sure you are focusing only on something at infinity, rather than on something that extends from infinity to a closer distance. I am not sure if that is clear (or even right!), but it is something that seems to happen in my workflow. I can easily correct for it if I have to, but generally it leads to better results than setting the true infinity focus.
    My photos are here: http://www.stuartrichardson.com and more recent work here: http://stuartrichardson.tumblr.com/ Please have a look at my book!
    My lab is here: http://www.customphotolab.is and on facebook
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  33. #33
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    74
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Quote Originally Posted by Speedgraphic View Post

    If the S continues they'll have to lower the price IMO. Pro's can afford it but why would they bother? No loaner bodies for failures and nice as they are, the offerings from Phase, Hassy, and Pentax cover the market with bigger sensors, better support, and lenses that nobody is seriously complaining about. The Leica S COULD be THE high end wedding photographer camera. I see it as nearly perfect for that application. But as a wedding photographer I would never invest that much money into something that is essentially a big question mark for reliability, and a big hurdle for any service that might come up.
    Really? Is this from personal experience or just more anecdotal inference?

    I for one have used both Hasselblad (9 years) and Leica S (3+ years). My experience with Leica has been far better than with the Hasselblads. Exceptionally fast pro service to and from Germany for a zoom lens repair, near immediate dealer support whenever requested. As for the camera itself, rock solid tethered performance when compared with Hasselblad, which suffered frequent component and FW800 connection issues throughout multiple model upgrades. I won't go into lens quality since you should be well aware of that.

  34. #34
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    200
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    I like his Mac related posts because they help me chart that course a bit. But as far as photo stuff, if said reviewer is not a world class talent actual working pro, read, not Mr. Reid, Dowling, Thein, Diglloyd, etc…then I am simply not interested in what they have to say, at all.

    There seems to be a huge ethos around how good a camera’s files are with correlating lack of talent that often accompanies those proclamations…I would rather see Koudelka’s use of an iPhone than someone’s incredibly lacking M246 review photos.

    As far as my experience with a nice used M240 I got a great deal on a couple months back, I have put some 8,000 frames on mine in shooting 4 magazine articles, a New York Times piece and three huge corporate photojournalism jobs. I had one lockup when I went to view an image while it was writing to the buffer, other than that, faultless…all for the reasonable price of 4K shipped.

    Yes, Leica can and hopefully will make improvements to both QC and pro relations in terms of repair times. But for now, I have kept my investment in the gear responsible and expectations realistic and so far, so good.
    Likes 4 Member(s) liked this post

  35. #35
    Senior Member JoelM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    San Diego, CA USA
    Posts
    264
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Quote Originally Posted by Ai_Print View Post
    But as far as photo stuff, if said reviewer is not a world class talent actual working pro, read, not Mr. Reid, Dowling, Thein, Diglloyd, etc…then I am simply not interested in what they have to say, at all.
    Why would it matter if someone weren't a pro? If anyone can make a good argument backed by good technique and science, then who cares. I've seen and known too many pros that either weren't very gear saavy or simply were successful due to factors other than creativity. Also, a "world class talent actual working pro" probably doesn't have time to review and detail all the ins and outs of his tools.

    Someone who is not interested in hearing others because of their status is taking an ignorant stance and not open to possibly new views.

    Joel
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  36. #36
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    200
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Quote Originally Posted by JoelM View Post
    Why would it matter if someone weren't a pro? If anyone can make a good argument backed by good technique and science, then who cares. I've seen and known too many pros that either weren't very gear saavy or simply were successful due to factors other than creativity. Also, a "world class talent actual working pro" probably doesn't have time to review and detail all the ins and outs of his tools.

    Someone who is not interested in hearing others because of their status is taking an ignorant stance and not open to possibly new views.
    I would rather listen to what folks on here have to say, who don't charge a fee to do so and are not possibly beholden to some camera maker's financial influence ( don't fool your self, they are ). Then I don't really care if the photos are good, any talent is involved because it's just feedback at a leisurely pace.

    I stand by what I said and I really don't care for this new category of "Web Sensation!" in what is gear review hero worship. The fact that Mr. Lloyd has become a Leica hating internet windbag highlights this.
    Likes 3 Member(s) liked this post

  37. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    590
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    I think we get used to hearing it all for free LOL

    Then somebody wants to charge and it's OMG, how outrageous!

    But really it's their right to sell their knowledge and our right not to buy it. I see no reason for resentment.

    Both Sean and Lloyd put alot of work into their tests, and both even tested the Kolari mod. So I think they have a claim to value all that work. I can see why some guys subscribe. I'm too cheap, but not too proud to admit it LOL
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  38. #38
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Shanghai
    Posts
    163
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    I have owned the S006 twice with almost all the lens, except maybe the 45mm and 180mm
    first time S was a very good experience in 2014. I have 30mm 70mm 120mm and a 30-90mm The system works very well and is one of the best ergonomics MF I have ever used. But somehow, I was introduced to Digital backs and Alpa, and I have decided to part with the S to fund my purchase into digital back.
    A year later, I have decided to jump back to the S camp since prices now are pretty decent for the body. This is where my view on Leica quality changed significantly. It is pretty poor to be honest.

    My bad experience is mainly on the body. I purchased a new body around April this year, it arrived with a huge dead pixel brand new. I called Leica up and they arrange for me to replace a new one from the store I bought it from. During the process, they asked for the serial no. card, and to my horror, the card in the box is not the same in serial with the body, and you can tell it is a mistake as only 1 no. in the middle of the serial is wrong. Leica told me no matter, as this happen a lot (what the hell??) So, I have waited 1 and a half months for my replacement body and upon turning it on, there's another dead pixel on the screen... but it's not visible on the LR through mapping. So I have decided to keep it. On this second order, I have also ordered the Contax adaptor, which came with the well-known 'not recognized lens upon turning on' issue. I have to unmount the adaptor and remount again everytime and prevent it from going into sleep mode. I have just confirm today with a friend who had this issue with the adaptor and he sent it back to Leica for replacement (which work fine now). I guess I have to do the same.

    I have 4 S lens this second time around (24 35 70 100) and hope that they might hold up a little better in terms of usage since most lens AF motor failed according to user on forums. The 35mm has a slow reacting aperture, every time I mount it, the first 2~3 shots, aperture will not close down properly and I need to press the DoF preview button a few times to get it going.

    Of the 7 items that I have for S, 3 of them has issues from day one... This is a pretty poor rate, and a first for any brand that I have own, though I did have to send my Leaf Credo 80 back to Denmark to have it clean as a piece of dust got under the filter cover (don't know how it get there!).

    All I am saying is this, all these problem shouldn't have happened in the first place, they charge premium amount for product that has high fail rate (it's high fail rate, not absolute no., but a rate), and all these customer service, nice as they were, are just them doing their job to keep their customer from walking out on the brand. It's the least they could do, really.
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  39. #39
    New Member Lictor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Zagreb, Croatia
    Posts
    14
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    I would even argue that most of the really creative folk in photography are usually not gear savvy at all, just mastering their equipment to the level that enables them to create what they want, and the people most knowledgeable about equipment very often lack any kind of creativity aiming for perfection without substance. However, it's always good to hear information from both camps IMHO.

    Cheers,

    Dan

    Quote Originally Posted by JoelM View Post
    Why would it matter if someone weren't a pro? If anyone can make a good argument backed by good technique and science, then who cares. I've seen and known too many pros that either weren't very gear saavy or simply were successful due to factors other than creativity. Also, a "world class talent actual working pro" probably doesn't have time to review and detail all the ins and outs of his tools.

    Someone who is not interested in hearing others because of their status is taking an ignorant stance and not open to possibly new views.

    Joel
    The most pathetic person in the world is someone who has sight, but has no vision. - Helen Keller
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

  40. #40
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Posts
    76
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    I am not as subscriber, so I can't read digilloyd's evaluation after the initial cry wolf about the S AF. But he is now into evaluation of the S lenses. Abot the 24mm he says:

    "This is a truly outstanding performance probably unequalled by any lens for the 35mm format. To see it on medium format 45 X 30mm sensor is very impressive. The particularly high cost of the Leica 24mm f/3.5 Super-Elmar-S ASPH is neatly explained by this example. But cost should not be confused with value—this is as good as it gets for a lens this wide (19mm equiv in the 35mm format) and thus the 24/3.5 SEM is surely a must-have lens for the S shooter."

    I can only agree.

    About the 45 (that I don't have) he says:

    "I liked the Leica 45mm f/2.8 Elmarit-S ASPH a lot and found it very appealing in the field. Highly recommended for Leica S shooters."

    About the sensor itself he says:

    "The CCD sensor on the S006 is superb."

    The S007 is now rumored to be released Aug 31. I know the first samples are out for testing, looking forward to the first reviews.
    - ErlingMM
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

  41. #41
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    413
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    I can confirm wholeheartedly about the 24mm. It might just as well have been glued to my S2-P these past few weeks. Can't get enough of it.

  42. #42
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Quote Originally Posted by kimyeesan View Post
    I have owned the S006 twice with almost all the lens, except maybe the 45mm and 180mm
    first time S was a very good experience in 2014. I have 30mm 70mm 120mm and a 30-90mm The system works very well and is one of the best ergonomics MF I have ever used. But somehow, I was introduced to Digital backs and Alpa, and I have decided to part with the S to fund my purchase into digital back.
    A year later, I have decided to jump back to the S camp since prices now are pretty decent for the body. This is where my view on Leica quality changed significantly. It is pretty poor to be honest.

    My bad experience is mainly on the body. I purchased a new body around April this year, it arrived with a huge dead pixel brand new. I called Leica up and they arrange for me to replace a new one from the store I bought it from. During the process, they asked for the serial no. card, and to my horror, the card in the box is not the same in serial with the body, and you can tell it is a mistake as only 1 no. in the middle of the serial is wrong. Leica told me no matter, as this happen a lot (what the hell??) So, I have waited 1 and a half months for my replacement body and upon turning it on, there's another dead pixel on the screen... but it's not visible on the LR through mapping. So I have decided to keep it. On this second order, I have also ordered the Contax adaptor, which came with the well-known 'not recognized lens upon turning on' issue. I have to unmount the adaptor and remount again everytime and prevent it from going into sleep mode. I have just confirm today with a friend who had this issue with the adaptor and he sent it back to Leica for replacement (which work fine now). I guess I have to do the same.

    I have 4 S lens this second time around (24 35 70 100) and hope that they might hold up a little better in terms of usage since most lens AF motor failed according to user on forums. The 35mm has a slow reacting aperture, every time I mount it, the first 2~3 shots, aperture will not close down properly and I need to press the DoF preview button a few times to get it going.

    Of the 7 items that I have for S, 3 of them has issues from day one... This is a pretty poor rate, and a first for any brand that I have own, though I did have to send my Leaf Credo 80 back to Denmark to have it clean as a piece of dust got under the filter cover (don't know how it get there!).

    All I am saying is this, all these problem shouldn't have happened in the first place, they charge premium amount for product that has high fail rate (it's high fail rate, not absolute no., but a rate), and all these customer service, nice as they were, are just them doing their job to keep their customer from walking out on the brand. It's the least they could do, really.
    Hi there,
    I can understand your frustration.
    It seems I am quite lucky,
    my S 006 has not had any problem so far and out of 8 S-lenses I have not had any problems.
    When I had a S2 before the S 006 it went to Leica service 2 or 3 times, however with very fast return and they solved the problems.

  43. #43
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    236
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Diglloyd or, for that matter, Sean Reid: if you don't like their stuff and/or don't want to pay for it, then move past it.

    Please note: I have never subscribed to Diglloyd. Although I hate Sean's web user interface and even find it insulting, I have subscribed 4-5 times over the past seven years. I always say that I won't do it again, but I then give in when I'm pondering a new purchase and want the "best reviews available." My mistake. I own it. And plan to move past it (errr, we'll see if I decide NOT to re-subscribe when the new M comes out!).
    Thanks 1 Member(s) thanked for this post

  44. #44
    Workshop Member kuau's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Park City, UT
    Posts
    1,071
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    34

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    I have been a on and off again subscriber to Lloyds site.
    Yes I have accepted that he is always right period with a huge ego, though not much talent in terms of his photo skills.

    He is for sure on a Leica bashing mode right now, though he always confuses me at the same time.
    His latest reviews are all over the place. I can never figure out of he likes something or not.
    Case in point his rolling review of the A7RII, on one hand he thinks it's a gadget, and at the same time he thinks it's revolutionary then he goes back to his Nikon 810.

    I'm hoping he will change his subscriber price for Leica for free 😁
    Steven Kornreich
    www.kuau.com

  45. #45
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    691
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Quote Originally Posted by peterv View Post
    ...I had planned to become a subscriber again, just to read his thoughts on the S system, but I guess I'll hold off for now.
    I got tired of him pretty quickly many years ago when he slagged off the M9 and yet clearly didn't get what the M9 was, had no experience of hyperfocal focusing and other techniques used by Leica photographers, had no idea of how to use a rangefinder camera effectively and basically compared it to SLRs. He may be technical, but he is totally unqualified to review the M system. I also got a bit fed up of him bragging about is Porsche 4WD thingy at about the same time and didn't renew my subscription.
    Likes 1 Member(s) liked this post

  46. #46
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    673
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    I've owned everything.. Just msg me. I'll give you my bias opinion on the matter. You're welcome to send me money, but it's not necessary. I also take S-lenses and M-lenses.
    Likes 2 Member(s) liked this post

  47. #47
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    449
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Getting tired of Diglloyd

    Quote Originally Posted by wentbackward View Post
    I got tired of him pretty quickly many years ago when he slagged off the M9 and yet clearly didn't get what the M9 was, had no experience of hyperfocal focusing and other techniques used by Leica photographers, had no idea of how to use a rangefinder camera effectively and basically compared it to SLRs. He may be technical, but he is totally unqualified to review the M system. I also got a bit fed up of him bragging about is Porsche 4WD thingy at about the same time and didn't renew my subscription.
    I agree, it's the tester that needs testing as much as the camera that's tested.

    Steve

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •