Fuji GFX50R + Leica 50mm Summilux-M ASPH
View attachment 144189
Night
View attachment 144186
View attachment 144187
View attachment 144188
View attachment 144189
Night
View attachment 144186
View attachment 144187
View attachment 144188
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Cats are like that. I might limit their internet access and cancel the credit card. You may get a large order of mice next...I have no idea how this happened. One minute, I'm sitting in my living room, and then *poof* a GFX 100 with 110/2 AND a cat.
And another hapless victim falls prey to Dante...I have no idea how this happened. One minute, I'm sitting in my living room, and then *poof* a GFX 100 with 110/2 AND a cat. This is a tight crop at f/2.8, 1/45, ISO 3200, hand-held.
Confused,
Matt
Dante and I are old friends. :loco::facesmack:And another hapless victim falls prey to Dante...
- John
P.S. Some people will use any excuse to post cat pics. :ROTFL:
P.P.S. Congrats on the new acquisition! Hope you enjoy every one of those 100 megapixels!
My understanding is that is not because of the OOF disks per se, but caused by a type of parallax where the width of the aperture is not evenly obscured by an edge, creating odd OOF edge effects. That is not really a problem with a particular lens, but the angular size of the entrance pupil in relation to an edge. We normally do not see it because the angular size of most entrance pupils for optics are small and the dof not as extreme. If that makes sense. If you hold your finger close to your eye and look past the edge, you will see a semi-transparent edge that can have a hard outline.The OOF disks are round, but sharp edged. This causes strange artifacts. For instance, here's the incredibly helpful Ronald Herard at Fotocare (not my picture, but straight OOC):
Oddly enough, I understand what you're saying :ROTFL:. In fact, the more I think about it, the more sense your explanation makes. I've just never encountered it before - in either the S 100/2 or 120/2.5, both of which have pretty large physical apertures.My understanding is that is not because of the OOF disks per se, but caused by a type of parallax where the width of the aperture is not evenly obscured by an edge, creating odd OOF edge effects. That is not really a problem with a particular lens, but the angular size of the entrance pupil in relation to an edge. We normally do not see it because the angular size of most entrance pupils for optics are small and the dof not as extreme. If that makes sense. If you hold your finger close to your eye and look past the edge, you will see a semi-transparent edge that can have a hard outline.