I am beginning to seriously consider a K-5II (maybe the s but not sure on that yet), mainly because of the AF fix- due to potential business reasons.
Certainly an expensive fix, but if that works, I consider the K-5 what it should have been. What I am most interested here is in AF accuracy- no major adjustments or the lenses or with them, that the AF consistently nails it- day light or lower light (moderate lower and mixed, tungsten and fluorescent light).
Anybody here has noticed a major difference? Jim if you are reading this, I understand you had mentioned it is much better. Now that you have more experience, do you find that holds?
Anyone else? I am looking for an objective assessment.
Thanks in advance.
- Ricardo
Certainly an expensive fix, but if that works, I consider the K-5 what it should have been. What I am most interested here is in AF accuracy- no major adjustments or the lenses or with them, that the AF consistently nails it- day light or lower light (moderate lower and mixed, tungsten and fluorescent light).
Anybody here has noticed a major difference? Jim if you are reading this, I understand you had mentioned it is much better. Now that you have more experience, do you find that holds?
Anyone else? I am looking for an objective assessment.
Thanks in advance.
- Ricardo