k-hawinkler
Well-known member
One of us is standing in the wrong line then.Right behind you, K-H. Right behind you ... :watch:
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
One of us is standing in the wrong line then.Right behind you, K-H. Right behind you ... :watch:
Seems like Panasonic will possibly cannibalize some of potential Leica SL sales unless they drop the price down into the $3-4K range.So it will have the SL mount. Anything else would have surprised me. Both being niche suppliers Leica as well as Panasonic will gain from cooperating on this.
https://www.43rumors.com/ft3-panasonic-might-use-the-leica-sl-mount-and-not-uhs-ii/
Many Leica SL owners use M-lenses. Question is how well would new Panasonic support them, or will that be a differentiator between the two bodies. Will the new Panasonic become the high resolution, EVF based Leica M? Since we know nothing, we can dream of everything .Seems like Panasonic will possibly cannibalize some of potential Leica SL sales unless they drop the price down into the $3-4K range.
Sharing a mount does make some sense from a financial standpoint and perhaps Panasonic can pump out those lenses at a much faster and more affordable (to the average photographer) rate.
Perhaps but I think most of the people that want an SL have them by now. It has been out for 3 years or so now. Perhaps some will buy Leica lenses but Panasonic lenses (assuming they’re to the quality of the Micro 4/3 versions) are great too at a more attainable price for people jumping into a new system.Many Leica SL owners use M-lenses. Question is how well would new Panasonic support them, or will that be a differentiator between the two bodies. Will the new Panasonic become the high resolution, EVF based Leica M? Since we know nothing, we can dream of everything .
It sounds plausible that such a new Panasonic camera would steal potential customers from Leica. It is also plausible that it will bring much more customers to the SL/TL mount and thus increase sales of Leica lenses.
Apparently ...43rumors changed the name of the group "Panasonic Full Frame" to "Panasonic-Leica-Sigma SL Full Frame system".
Did I miss something ?
Apparently ...
(FT5) A new force is building up: Leica, Panasonic and Sigma are on board together on the Full Frame SL mount project!
:chug:
Well this is interesting... if true. Would likely mean that Sigma could put out L-Mount versions of all their Art Series lenses relatively quickly which could likely compete somewhat favorably with the existing Leica SL lenses. Panasonic could focus on video centric/hybrid use lenses as well. I’m hoping for PDAF though still. DFD is great in good light but in lowlight it hunts more than I like.Leica, Sigma AND Panasonic -not sure if this has been posted already, but very interesting and encouraging for this SL mount system (group) :thumbs:
https://www.43rumors.com/ft5-a-new-...-together-on-the-full-frame-sl-mount-project/
M-mount->L-mount adapter.I have not paid much attention to Leica SL cameras.
But owning many M and R lenses, I stopped counting, what adapters would I need to use them on the new Panasonic SL-Mount camera?
Thanks Tre, so then an SL camera has an L-Mount. :thumbup:M-mount->L-mount adapter.
Only if they want to optimize the camera for M and LTM lenses.Presumably the new camera would have to have thin sensor cover glass to avoid corner smearing unlike my Sony A7r.2.
Thanks. How is the SL camera in this regard?Only if they want to optimize the camera for M and LTM lenses.
Adaptors I use are M>SL ( Leica) and Nikon > SL ( Novaflex)I have not paid much attention to Leica SL cameras.
But owning many M and R lenses, I stopped counting, what adapters would I need to use them on the new Panasonic SL-Mount camera?
Adaptors I use are M>SL ( Leica) and Nikon > SL ( Novaflex)
SL + Noctilux is a marriage made in heaven.
SL + Otus55 or any Zeiss Milvus =same.
SL + any native zoom from Leica = best zooms money can buy
SL + any M lens from 35mm up = outstanding
Vierri posts many landscapes made on SL using Voigtlander wides - check out SL thread - of course PP required to adjust for distortion as non Leica lenses do not have in camera correction applied.
As for M wides I only use WATE occassionaly on SL - I prefer it on M10 for happy snaps. I use Zeiss Milvus 15/2.8 on SL with exceptional results. However my wide angle shooting is mostly on MF with Schneider/Hasselblad and now Fuji being tested so cant comment past above.
Leica SL and CL have been designed to work very well with M lenses, almost as good as M cameras.Thanks. How is the SL camera in this regard?
... and the mount is actually "L", not "SL". SL is the camera, and the mount is also used with the TL and CL cameras. However, if "the internet" has decided that it's "SL", even Leica may be "wrong" :ROTFL:M-mount->L-mount adapter.
Well, I think this is overall excellent news for the L (SL) mount as suddenly more and hopefully cheaper than native Leica SL lenses become available for cameras with that mont, making that mount kind of a standard like for example m43, but now for FF. Would definitely attract more third party vendors to offer products.... and the mount is actually "L", not "SL". SL is the camera, and the mount is also used with the TL and CL cameras. However, if "the internet" has decided that it's "SL", even Leica may be "wrong" :ROTFL:
Whatever the name is, I find this a very interesting development and extremely positive. It will make the new Panasonic go from being a potential niche camera to being a real competitor in the market.
I bought an a7R11 before the SL came out in order to use it as a 'lens horse' - my experience was that my 28 Summicron had visibly poor performance at edges with A7r11 and I am by no means a pixel peeping type...the SL performs much better with M lenses than the Sony did - however I am not interested in buying into the price of SL prime lenses V other makers good glass - as I see no benefit for me going down this direction given advancements being made by so many companies so quickly.Many thanks.
I also have the WATE and it works well even on my Sony A7r.2.
My CV 15/4.5 in VM-Mount also shows no corner smearing on A7r.2.
Yup, I have number of 21, 28, 35, and 50mm Leica M lenses that all perform poorly on Sony FE cameras, including when stopped down. However, all my R lenses perform just fine.I bought an a7R11 before the SL came out in order to use it as a 'lens horse' - my experience was that my 28 Summicron had visibly poor performance at edges with A7r11 and I am by no means a pixel peeping type...the SL performs much better with M lenses than the Sony did - however I am not interested in buying into the price of SL prime lenses V other makers good glass - as I see no benefit for me going down this direction given advancements being made by so many companies so quickly.
I hope Sigma has access to L mount and rumours are true - as I would appreciate being to be able to use Sigma primes with autofocus etc on the SL body and SL Zooms on a Panasonic body with higher megapixel chip than the SL.