Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
The R80/1.4 is doing fine as is the R100/2.8 Macro.I trust the R 80/1.4 will work OK considering different image circles. If that works out then my APO 180/2.8 and 19/2.8 R lenses will be fun to try also.
Well, it depends on your sample but this is from mine.I also have that 500/5.6. Were your shots sharp with that lens or did it leave a lot to be desired?
I trust the R 80/1.4 will work OK considering different image circles. If that works out then my APO 180/2.8 and 19/2.8 R lenses will be fun to try also.
Man, that looks just fine to me. Mine was not even used when I got it and in the original box and original case. Worked well on my XF so it should be fine here too assuming my Fotodiox adapter is correct. Same with the MF black 300/5.6 with its slide out hood and small size, but have not tried it as yet.Well, it depends on your sample but this is from mine.
https://www.getdpi.com/gallery/showimage.php?i=32110&c=205
Bazooka is the correct term. It's just fun using it where other photographers can't help asking what it is.The 200/2.8 and 500/5.6 need a little extra sharpening in C1 / ACR and also stopping down a stop or so to bring up the acuity. However. they're not going to perform as well as the native Fuji 250mm.
Funnily enough, my 500/5.6 was pretty much brand new too. I guess not many people (i.e. me) liked dragging that bazooka around. I've had mine for decades.