Great shots to see, and good to see how well this lens does.Lumix GX80, G Vario 7-14mm f4
Taj Mahal, Agra, India
(-;
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Great shots to see, and good to see how well this lens does.Lumix GX80, G Vario 7-14mm f4
Taj Mahal, Agra, India
Ditto. Really good work - enjoying every frame.Great shots to see, and good to see how well this lens does.
(-;
This is the best photo of Taj Mahal I've seen in a very long time. Excellent work!12-60 SWD....
What Louis said. :thumbup:Really appreciate your comments Louis, I am so pleased with this body of work. I had no real expectation from this trip other than to really enjoy the experience (which we did in bucketfuls) no plan, just see where the subject took me. As I processed the files I realised that there were some really satisfying pics.
The camera is secondary imo. I always seem to get a similar look no matter what I use Having said that the combo of GX80 and the lenses I used seem to gel somehow (perhaps the bright light helped). Only downside is the 12-60 SWD really needs pdaf to perform with any speed and the amount of "street" shots I missed is a little disheartening. I will get a more suitable lens for my next trip! (native micro 4/3rds).
Hi Alan,I am so pleased with this body of work.
Completely agree. My other camera is the Fujifilm GFX50s which you might think would entirely make m43rds redundant but my G9 plus lenses are not. Yes, I mainly use it for wildlife but if I have the need of lightweight, high quality I do not hesitate to choose the G9 over the GFX50s. I just can't see transitioning to a FF system while I have the G9 and GFX. In fact, were I not to have the GFX, I still wouldn't choose FF as it has the worst of both worlds, weight and bulk without a vastly superior IQ (unlike the Fujifilm where the weight and bulk is rewarded with the most sublime results).What Louis said. :thumbup:
I keep coming back to how well m4/3 works for some of us. It's a system that doesn't get in the way of photography. It's transparent to a degree that I don't really think about the camera at all when I take photos, and I say that in spite of not really liking electronic viewfinders much. Size and ergonomics are apparently more important when it comes to removing the camera body as a barrier.
I'm not sure about this (and I'm not being specific about Alan's India photos).I (and perhaps others unfamiliar with the area) would likely benefit greatly from brief expository captions for each photo. Those would give the work much more depth.
- Leigh