After the rain
CF058843 by jean-luc cochy, sur Flickr
Phase One DF+, Phase One P65+ and Schneider 55 mm .
CF058843 by jean-luc cochy, sur Flickr
Phase One DF+, Phase One P65+ and Schneider 55 mm .
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Hmmmm.This is an other story, and I don't know where to post it, here or in the thread "Printing and Output". Well, now it's here !
The story is that I discovered on a website a chemical printing process implemented by the Fresson family (in France), first for black and white in 1899, then for colour from the middle of the last century. This legacy chemical process is unique in the world (I think) and I find it wonderful, at least for some suitable images. It was used by many first rank photographers, such as Martine Frank, Frank Horvat, Lucien Clergue, and is still used by Sarah Moon, Bernard Plossu....
Below is an example of this "Fresson process", through a picture taken by Bernard Plossu in Giverny (home of Claude Monet after his fifties).
View attachment 211500
I made the picture below yesterday evening (Hassy X1D II + XCD90 f/3.2), in the little harbour of Playa San Juan (Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain). I have tried to recover the "Fresson" feeling, but I think I am still far from that. It illustrates perfectly the difference between the digital photography processed by an "amateur" and the legacy handwork developed for more than a century by a profesional workshop providing its "know how" and services to the best photographers.
Thoughts ?
View attachment 211501
Too low-rez. You can see the pixels.
You have much more detail at smaller scales in your image than in the Plossu. I think the stippling, which looks great on the sky, rocks, and water, is a bit coarse for the boats - giving them an OOF feel rather than a textured one. It's very interesting!
Matt
From what I have seen and learned about the Fresson process, the results can vary depending on many factors. And much of it is a closely-held secret by the family. However, the prints all seem to have a dreamy, moody quality which may not be appropriate for the digital example shown. Maybe the effort to reproduce the look should be applied to a more appropriate subject.
... i think the attempt is going in the right direction,
but try it with a motif that has larger areas, is not so small-scale and has a more diffuse lighting mood ...
Thanks to all for your comments and thoughts !! Actually, I've seen images enlarged using the Fresson process which are not grainy. Their process(es) depends strongly upon the image and obviously results from deep discussions with the photographer. It's more a question of colours than grain. And I am very far from getting results for so many variations. Just an attempt.
This should be posted in the "Fat pixel backs" threadToo low-rez. You can see the pixels.
SOUP approved!!And here is the rare Orange-breasted Pygmy Raven (yes, I know nothing about birds. How did you guess?)
X2D, Mamiya 645 200/2.8 APO - tight crop. Whenever I get a bird, no matter how ordinary, with a manual focus telephoto, I am reminded of the awesome work of @doug with manual focus 500mm lenses. Without magnified focus peaking, I would have a perfect zero percent hit-rate. But it still feels like an accomplishment.
Matt
Wonderful, I laughed out loud. Soup's and the pigeon's expressions are perfect.