Woody Campbell
Workshop Member
Today's post. Same technical details. But this file is heavily manipulated.
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Hi Jim!
I know this is not the right tread for film based photos, but the difference compared to digital intrigues me
I have scanned the negatives whit my Epson 700.
Yes there is a lot of contrast and sharpening in the photos, but that is because I have used my print files, on paper it looks exactly as I want
And I am experimenting a lot today on the borderland between photo and graphic art, but that is my taste. On a resent exhibition I had, many of the viewers was not sure what they did se, photos or...
I include a part of the first picture, Porta 400. It shows what can happen whit old film.
I really like the mystique and softness in your last photo :thumbs:
Ray
another winner.Today's post. Same technical details. But this file is heavily manipulated.
Jim -this is lovely. This series is turning into a major statement. Can you share details on processing?leaf 75s, zeiss 110/2
Derek - I like this a lot. What grad setup are you using?
Its the Lee Push On filter holder (compression fit) for the 95mm lenses. Here is the link:Derek - I like this a lot. What grad setup are you using?
Woody, this one and I think the one from the 13th are right near my office, on 46th and 6th.Another day, another post. H3D + 35=90 @90.
Got it - thanks.Its the Lee Push On filter holder (compression fit) for the 95mm lenses. Here is the link:
http://www.leefiltersusa.com/camera/products/show/ref:C4761061684662/
Kind regards,
Derek Jecxz
http://www.jecxz.com
I love this.Today's post. Same technical details. But this file is heavily manipulated.