Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
That said, for the 90V, it took them an awful long time…I suppose at 90mm it is not so difficult to come up with a fast and excellent design, compared to much shorter focal lengths.
They did not sell any, but they have shipped a couple to testers under NDA.Yeah, something happened to cause that much of a delay. Didn’t they ship some, then suddenly they’re out of stock for a year….?
Crazy.I was able to take four quick test shots yesterday at f/8 hand-held of my backyard test subject - trees, including one pine tree.
Interesting. I know they were in part, designed for "quick" AF I wonder if there is a critical focus little issue going on.Well, it seems that the new V series (collaboration with Panasonic ?) is not as good as the previous and first XCD's, designed by HB but made in Japan by Nittoh. The 55V (that I own) is good for street photography or portraits/images when sharpness at the edges is not imperious. Not as good, by far, as the XCD65. And the (light, indeed) 28P and 38V are not that good when compared with the XCD30 or even the XCD45P. I doubt the 90V would be at the level of the previous XCD90. But wait and see, I am looking forward to reading the first impressions.
At first I hated sending the 38V and 55V back, they were such a complete joy to use. But in having been back from Scotland for three weeks now, I am just blown away by how good the 45P and 65 XCD look in the images I made, so any regret I had in returning them is now long gone.Well, it seems that the new V series (collaboration with Panasonic ?) is not as good as the previous and first XCD's, designed by HB but made in Japan by Nittoh. The 55V (that I own) is good for street photography or portraits/images when sharpness at the edges is not imperious. Not as good, by far, as the XCD65. And the (light, indeed) 28P and 38V are not that good when compared with the XCD30 or even the XCD45P. I doubt the 90V would be at the level of the previous XCD90. But wait and see, I am looking forward to reading the first impressions.
What corner issues? Do you have some photos that you can share that show corner issues. I have all three V lenses and haven't seen corner issues. I'm not looking for a food fight, just enlightenment.Among others, I think landscape photographers are catching on to the corner issues of the 38 and 55...
There was a long thread on this here recently, with comparisons to the XCD65 and XCD45. I haven't found the 55V to be lacking (my reference being Rodenstock and SK tech cam lenses and other XCD lenses, but not the XCD65) and find it ideal for taking the kit on the road, but this may reflect the lens being well suited to my preferred subject matter and the way I compose. Just my own experience, which may have no relevance to others. YMMV, of course.What corner issues? Do you have some photos that you can share that show corner issues. I have all three V lenses and haven't seen corner issues. I'm not looking for a food fight, just enlightenment.
Joe