After reading this article
http://www.digitaltrends.com/photography/sony-cyber-shot-rx1r-2/ I have the question what are the
inherent advantages of the Rx1r2 with its builtin lens versus the ILC A7r2. For the Rx1r2 the article lists:
• Alignment precision down to the micron level for lens and sensor
• Fixed 35mm F2 Zeiss Sonnar T* lens, delivers sharper images, from the center and out to the corners.
• In-lens shutter rather than focal plane shutter
• 1/2000-sec flash synch speed
• Significant reduction in overall body size
• Optical variable low-pass filter
On the downside it lists:
• No IBIS
• No 4K video
Lucille certainly made a convincing case for the Rx1r/2 earlier in this thread.
On the other hand the A7r2 enables use of rangefinder lenses, in particular when it's modified by Kolari.
I guess this is an apples and oranges comparison.
The two systems seem to serve quite different purposes.
However, they overlap for 35 mm focal length.
So, my question then is which 35 mm IC lens would compete IQ-wise with the fixed 35mm F2 Zeiss Sonnar T*?
For native FE and AF there seems to be only one, the Sony Distagon T* FE 35mm f/1.4 ZA Lens.
I wonder though how images shot with those two lenses compare?