First off, I have no real issue with any of the assorted definitions, and agree that any camera with movements is a technical, but then so is any camera in a box designed to withstand 1,000 degree heat, or an old finderless Leica MX designed specifically for microscopy. So I do think it is perhaps a valid discussion to have a set of definitions that distinguishes the current crop of tech cameras.It would probably depend on which of the thousand hair-splitting definitions and categorizing you chose to adopt.
SNIP
In my view, and to keep definitions simple, we can say that a technical camera is a camera with movements, possibly on both standards - a view camera. Limited versions of technical cameras are the so-called wide-angle cameras (i.e. Cambo DS), the Techno is a more developed version, so is the M-2 as I can see from web info, to end up with the classic studio view cameras (i.e. Linhof 679 and similar).
They used to distinguish "Press" from traditional "View" cameras by whatever means of external focusing aid they had, whether it be a cammed rangefinder or a simple distance scale, yet they both allowed for movements and had bellows extension bed focus mechanisms.
I would propose a similar convention to make distinctions in digital tech cameras, since each basic format has operational and technical advantages and disadvantages. How about if you need to directly view a ground-glass to focus it, it should fall into one main group; if you don't need a GG -- meaning it has a direct scale on the bed or some form of helical -- it should fall into another. For example, I'd call an Arca M-Line 2 a "view" camera even though there are marks on the rails that would allow me to repeat various distances with a given lens once I had them, but I'd call an Arca RM camera with built-in helical a "tech" camera because I can get a direct focus distance for any lens without ever mounting a GG. Similarly, I would refer to a Linhof Techno and Silvestri Bi-Cams view cameras, and the Alpa series and Cambo W's as tech cams. We can perhaps choose a better word than "tech", since indeed they are all technical to a certain degree. What do you think?