davidsuchoff
Member
For those who have the new CFV 100, does the lack of IBIS limit handheld use? My concern is that the high megapixel sensor is unforgiving and will show the slightest movement.
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
It all depends on the conditions, available light, focal length and how many Red Bulls you drank in the morning.For those who have the new CFV 100, does the lack of IBIS limit handheld use? My concern is that the high megapixel sensor is unforgiving and will show the slightest movement.
Hi,For those who have the new CFV 100, does the lack of IBIS limit handheld use? My concern is that the high-megapixel sensor is unforgiving and will show the slightest movement.
I always look at Rembrandts through a 40x loupe. I got tired of fighting with the security guards, so I got a 717 GigaPixel scan of the The Night Watch.Sharpness is a perceptual quality. Resolution does not affect the ability to handhold a camera and shoot a sharp image. The tolerances are the same for all cameras regardless of pixel resolution. The output is related to how the final image is viewed, not on whether you can see something at 100% monitor view. 100% monitor view is not an actual viewing condition any viewer will have. If you shoot on a 24MP camera and, for example, the 16x20 print appears sharp, it would also have appeared sharp with a 100MP camera, even if at 100% monitor view, the sharpness of the 100MP was not "perfect."
And the Baby Shark Dance is the most viewed video on YouTube. I think this a species-wide problem.but so many threads and comments on 'sharpness of lenses' on here....
please explain?
If I had a car that could go 0-60 in 4 seconds, it doesn't mean that I would have to floor it every time I accelerated. Nice to have, when merging onto a highway from a stop-sign, though (the Merritt Parkway .. grrrr).I suppose the underlying question is “if you are going to the trouble of running a higher resolution camera, why would you not want to get that resolution out of it?” Yes, there is the MF look, but there is also the narrow depth of field available with lenses available only on more popular formats.
I suppose that the other answer is that you want to use the camera that you have with you.