I'm thinking of getting an XE1 to replace my NEX7 mainly due to the range of Fuji lenses available compared to the Sony ones.
In future there may well be suitable Sony lenses but as I write there is no Sony 14mm and the 30 macro is not as attractive as the Fuji 60mm macro in my opinion. The ideal lens for me would be around 90mm but as yet neither Fuji or Sony make one.
I particularly like the retro/well built look of the XE1/XE2 and the various lenses.
Has anyone, particularly those who have experience of both Sony and Fuji any opinions they would like to offer? Any particular advantages (to either camera system) that isn't evident from the specifications?
I tend to only use prime lenses and I always shoot raw. I like low light work; theater/concert, candid, etc.
In future there may well be suitable Sony lenses but as I write there is no Sony 14mm and the 30 macro is not as attractive as the Fuji 60mm macro in my opinion. The ideal lens for me would be around 90mm but as yet neither Fuji or Sony make one.
I particularly like the retro/well built look of the XE1/XE2 and the various lenses.
Has anyone, particularly those who have experience of both Sony and Fuji any opinions they would like to offer? Any particular advantages (to either camera system) that isn't evident from the specifications?
I tend to only use prime lenses and I always shoot raw. I like low light work; theater/concert, candid, etc.