markowich
New member
georgl,
i have an H2, but had no time to test it with P65+. so far i have used the P65+ only on my alpa max with rodenstock/schneider lenses. great!
and i do not like even iso 200 on H3DII 50. but you will find less discriminating testers (luminous-landscape for example) who have a less
critical view of high isos in MF.
peter
i have an H2, but had no time to test it with P65+. so far i have used the P65+ only on my alpa max with rodenstock/schneider lenses. great!
and i do not like even iso 200 on H3DII 50. but you will find less discriminating testers (luminous-landscape for example) who have a less
critical view of high isos in MF.
peter
The S2 is the successor of the S1, not DMR/M8/M9 which are developed & made by Imacon/Jenoptik.
Phase and Hasselblad will go 40+MP (I don't think we will see anything but P40+/P65+ and H4D-50/60 in the future from them), the trade-off is size and speed.
@Markowich
You mentioned you used HC/Fuji-lenses with an P65+ - how did you do that, have you a H1/H2? And yes, I've used these lenses (although with film and a less demanding 39MP-back). They are good >f5.6 but in extreme situations you have to be careful if you really want to achieve significantly more performance than with the <40MP-backs.
The actual size of the photodiodes of the Kodak/Dalsa-sensors is unknown, theoretically they are about 30% smaller than the previous 6.8µm-generation - but most likely the fill-rate has been improved to compensate for that.
You have an H3DII-50? So you know what to expect, same sensor + 2/3EV-1EV due to microlenses. I never got the chance to handle the 50MP-Hassi for a long time, but 400ASA (640ASA with S2?) looked quite well (and at least as good as 800ASA from DSLRs) from my memory.
The P65+ is great, I had the chance to use it on an Alpa - but it's entirely different from the S2 and nearly twice as expensive (since everybody complains about the S2-price).