Site Sponsors
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 51 to 100 of 119

Thread: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

  1. #51
    Subscriber Member tashley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    South of England
    Posts
    3,295
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post
    Tim, I think I can safely say you'll never look back

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob View Post
    The only problem I had with my P65+ was that I waited too long before getting it.
    -bob
    C'mon guys, you already assimilated me with the Cube... I admitted defeat months ago and now purchase what I am told to!

  2. #52
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    253
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by PeterA View Post
    Whilst Sinar have an easy and elegant white shading feature - I can also say the back has a lot of " eccentric" behaviour and "chunkiness" inbuilt - compared to Hasselblad elegance it is a clumsy drunken oaf in many aspects of its operation ....LOL
    what do you mean by 'eccentric' behaviour and 'chunkiness'? i'm curious as i'm toying with the insane idea* of getting closer to an artec with sinar back and whilst there is plenty of user feedback on phase backs i haven't found that much on sinar backs.

    -christoph

    * i don't know how often i have read "Abandon Hope All Ye Who Enter Here" before clicking on the link to this subforum :-).

  3. #53
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    West Australia
    Posts
    66
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post
    Tim, I think I can safely say you'll never look back
    Jack, can I go slightly off topic here and at the risk of provoking an argument over the merits of file formats ! - ask if it is possible to create DNGs from P65 files? I know next to nothing about C1. Now that Sinar are offering conversions of arTec to other mounts I may consider a P65 in the future.

    Cheers JOHN

  4. #54
    Administrator Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Prescott, Arizona
    Posts
    4,492
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    367

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    If you want to create a version of the file that is no longer recognizable by the original raw converters, and you don't mind shifting from one proprietary format to another, than sure, you can convert to dng. DNG, when you pick it apart, is a metadata decorated version of tiff. So, do your your raw conversion first in the native format, then convert to dng if you would like, but there is no benefit to that that you do not realize when converting to tiff other than it is more difficult for the majority of processing tools to deal with it. The only benefit that I can see is that inferior proprietary tools such as lightroom, think of dng as universal, but then look at the results at 100%, and if you have eyes, you won't do that again.
    DNG is NOT the holy grail of file formats., it is the lowest common denominator of file formats.
    -bob

  5. #55
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    West Australia
    Posts
    66
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob View Post
    If you want to create a version of the file that is no longer recognizable by the original raw converters, and you don't mind shifting from one proprietary format to another, than sure, you can convert to dng. DNG, when you pick it apart, is a metadata decorated version of tiff. So, do your your raw conversion first in the native format, then convert to dng if you would like, but there is no benefit to that that you do not realize when converting to tiff other than it is more difficult for the majority of processing tools to deal with it. The only benefit that I can see is that inferior proprietary tools such as lightroom, think of dng as universal, but then look at the results at 100%, and if you have eyes, you won't do that again.
    DNG is NOT the holy grail of file formats., it is the lowest common denominator of file formats.
    -bob
    Hello Bob,

    Sorry I really didnt mean to start a debate about file formats. Yes I know that DNGs are not the holy grail. The reason I asked is that Im a long term lightroom user and would like to have copies of P65 files in the library. Yes I know there are better converters - and I would plan to use C1 if I get a P65 back- however the complete integrated workflow with lightroom I find to be very good and well Im just used to it !

    Cheers JOHN

  6. #56
    Administrator Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Prescott, Arizona
    Posts
    4,492
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    367

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by jps View Post
    Hello Bob,

    Sorry I really didnt mean to start a debate about file formats. Yes I know that DNGs are not the holy grail. The reason I asked is that Im a long term lightroom user and would like to have copies of P65 files in the library. Yes I know there are better converters - and I would plan to use C1 if I get a P65 back- however the complete integrated workflow with lightroom I find to be very good and well Im just used to it !

    Cheers JOHN
    If you are using lightroom as a catalog, then you might be better served to just create jpg versions and file those. At least lightroom knows how to render those.
    -bob

  7. #57
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Bill Caulfeild-Browne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Bruce Peninsula, Canada
    Posts
    2,535
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    184

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Several years ago I converted a lot of my files to DNG because I bought into the notion that DNG might survive where individual companies' formats might not.

    BIG mistake! Many were P45 files that can no longer permit C1 to provide such things as lens corrections. I will never do it again.

    Fortunately I saw the light soon enough and by the time I got the P45+ I was leaving my files in the Phase tif format - and have ever since.

    Bil

  8. #58
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    West Australia
    Posts
    66
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill Caulfeild-Browne View Post
    Several years ago I converted a lot of my files to DNG because I bought into the notion that DNG might survive where individual companies' formats might not.

    BIG mistake! Many were P45 files that can no longer permit C1 to provide such things as lens corrections. I will never do it again.

    Fortunately I saw the light soon enough and by the time I got the P45+ I was leaving my files in the Phase tif format - and have ever since.

    Bil
    Bill,

    forgive my ignorance - can lightroom read and open a phase tif file ? If so I dont need to convert to DNG

    JOHN

  9. #59
    Administrator Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Prescott, Arizona
    Posts
    4,492
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    367

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by jps View Post
    Hello Bob,

    Sorry I really didnt mean to start a debate about file formats. Yes I know that DNGs are not the holy grail. The reason I asked is that Im a long term lightroom user and would like to have copies of P65 files in the library. Yes I know there are better converters - and I would plan to use C1 if I get a P65 back- however the complete integrated workflow with lightroom I find to be very good and well Im just used to it !

    Cheers JOHN
    Mainly the issue is that Lightroom knows how to render the embedded preview, but does not know how to deal with the camera metadata, so minor issues such as the the luminance of the image are just not represented in the catalogue.
    Lightroom does reasonably well with camera files that represent the majority of the market such as canon or nikon files. Even Leica files are not too bad, but at the moment the higher-end stuff is not well served.
    I looked at some S2 files with both lightroom and C1 (no editorial comment since I thought they were "weak") so I have no issue with lightroom per se, but like aperture, they tend to hit the middle of the market and do what 80% of the market requires. Unfortunately I think I fall in that outside 20%.
    -bob

  10. #60
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    171
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by David Grover / Hasselblad View Post
    I am sorry Richard, I have to take issue with that statement.

    There are NOT serious issues with timing and using Tech Cameras with Hasselblad products.

    It was explained to you many times with plenty of correspondence from support and even directly from R&D themselves.

    Agreeably a few mechanical shutters have caused issues (as I have spoken to PeterA about this too) but to say ALL cameras will cause you a problem is incorrect and unfair.

    Even the minor amount of shutters that can give incorrect timing signals, can still be used with a simple work around.

    The actual white shading method in Phocus is now almost exactly the same as the Sinar solution, and can be used for tethered or untethered capture.

    David
    Bless you David! But that was exactly what you said to me with my H3D! Contradicting yourself again! When you 1st joined LL that Hasselblad does NOT need double cabling in our discussions and then turned around 4 months later and stated to me in the heat of litigation that I needed double cabling to resolve "timing" issue AND that I had a faulty Copal shutter which Linos tested and was said NOTHING was wrong - and Linos went further and gave me a NEW copal shutter and still had issues with your DB. I sent to Copal Japan and they said there was NOTHING wrong!

    Then Alpa waded into the debate in Oct 2009 in their news letter.

    PS: Further two HR lenses (HR28 and HR40) still have same issue.

    We make mistakes so lets move on and get it right.


  11. #61
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    carstenw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    2,530
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob View Post
    If you want to create a version of the file that is no longer recognizable by the original raw converters, and you don't mind shifting from one proprietary format to another, than sure, you can convert to dng. DNG, when you pick it apart, is a metadata decorated version of tiff.
    Well, the image data is stored differently in general, so all they share is some tag definitions and the general container scheme. The interesting part is generally not the same between TIFF and DNG.

    The data in the DNG is only proprietary (as being opposed to open, since it is unimportant if an openly published, license-fee-free and freely implementable format is proprietary in any *other* sense) if the program which you used to export the data chose to keep something in a proprietary format, or refused/was unable to export it altogether, such as Nikon's encrypted white balance.

    By the way, if the software from which you exported the DNG can no longer deal with it, it is clear where to point the finger, right? Most manufacturers are resisting the DNG format with tooth and nail (a few are not, such as Leica), but the tools are all there for them to use and adopt.

    So, do your your raw conversion first in the native format, then convert to dng if you would like, but there is no benefit to that that you do not realize when converting to tiff other than it is more difficult for the majority of processing tools to deal with it. The only benefit that I can see is that inferior proprietary tools such as lightroom, think of dng as universal, but then look at the results at 100%, and if you have eyes, you won't do that again.
    DNG normally still contains the pre-debayered data, and is typically much more compact than a TIFF. I would even go so far as to say that TIFF is the stupid version of DNG, for the purposes of photographers, and the only purpose for which I would recommend it would be as a *final* work, i.e. a negative for future prints, without any further editing being desired.

    The advantage of converting to DNG rather than TIFF is that the de-Bayering is still not done, so you have the ability to apply future improvements in this algorithm, when new releases of software comes out, and when was the last release of C1 which didn't claim to have improved the debayering? And the smaller space requirements; it is beyond me why a decent compression scheme has never been universally accepted for TIFFs.

    What post-raw-processing tools do you refer to which can modify TIFF but not DNG, and *which are interesting tools for photographers*?

    By the way, C1 may still have the edge on Lightroom in debayering, sharpness, and white balance, and in colour profile handling, but Lightroom is light-years ahead of C1 in most other ways, and the gap in quality is getting smaller with each revision. I would not bet against Lightroom and other similar tools for very long any more.

    It is already the case that when someone actually masters both programs and posts results to demonstrate the superiority of C1, the differences are diminishingly small, but are described as being huge. This trend will only accelerate. Companies like Phase One simply do not have the R&D budget of Adobe, Apple, or other tools companies.

    With the Sinar workflow, you can handle debayering, sharpening, white balance and noise reduction in eXposure, then export to DNG and import to Lightroom, to have the best of both worlds. I think this approach was very forward-looking, and am sorry that they couldn't have had a more supportive parent company than Jenoptik.

    DNG is NOT the holy grail of file formats., it is the lowest common denominator of file formats.
    I am not sure what would make you call DNG the lowest common denominator. It is a container for IPTC/EXIF and the original raw data, unless you chose to bake in the white balance or something else as you exported, your choice. The DNG is only as stupid as each manufacturer chooses to make it.
    Carsten - Website

  12. #62
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    561
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by rhsu View Post
    Bless you David! But that was exactly what you said to me with my H3D! Contradicting yourself again! When you 1st joined LL that Hasselblad does NOT need double cabling in our discussions and then turned around 4 months later and stated to me in the heat of litigation that I needed double cabling to resolve "timing" issue AND that I had a faulty Copal shutter which Linos tested and was said NOTHING was wrong - and Linos went further and gave me a NEW copal shutter and still had issues with your DB. I sent to Copal Japan and they said there was NOTHING wrong!

    Then Alpa waded into the debate in Oct 2009 in their news letter.

    PS: Further two HR lenses (HR28 and HR40) still have same issue.

    We make mistakes so lets move on and get it right.

    Richard,

    As opposed to be blessed I would rather carry out our conversation in a professional manner as is befitting with the general spirit of getdpi.

    Furthermore I have no wish to hijack this thread as it is concerning the arTec.

    So to finish on my part, stating that we have serious issues with sync timing is unfair and incorrect.

    As you have discussed with Hasselblad Support and R&D, this is a situation that may occur with some, not all lenses, and there are workarounds for those that won't sync without a wake-up.

    This is somewhat a better situation than always having to use a wake-up signal as opposed to some lenses which do not need it at all.

    Regards,


    David

  13. #63
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    561
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by neil View Post
    David,

    Can you tell me what the simple work around is. I had a few problems when I first started using my CFV39 digital back on a tech camera but managed to sort myself out be asking some questions on this forum.

    I set the digital back to 2 seconds exposure in the menu. Plug a Hasselblad electronic cable release into the digital back. Send in a wake up signal. Fire the mechanical lens shutter which is set for correct exposure. Back times out at 2 seconds and then writes the file out. The photo is ok when I do this.

    If you have a link to a web page or a forum discussion which talks about this please could you let me know.

    Regards

    Neil
    Hi Neil,

    Yes, you are doing the right thing here!

    You could always see if you lens has an "M" sync setting, then try this, as you may then negate the need for the wake up cable.

    David

  14. #64
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    107
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    6

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    David,

    Thanks very much, When the lens has an m setting will give that a go. I am actually quite happy with the way it all works sending in a wake up signal etc. The method works really well with my Silvestri camera with both LF lens and Hass V lens. Also its one less cable that has to go over the top of the camera so I find it more convenient as the cables get in the way of the sliding adapter.

    Regards

    Neil

  15. #65
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by carstenw View Post

    By the way, C1 may still have the edge on Lightroom in debayering, sharpness, and white balance, and in colour profile handling, but Lightroom is light-years ahead of C1 in most other ways,
    DNG is not fully open, as Adobe always does a "few more things" behind the scenes than other DNG converters do. As a raw format, I feel DNG takes a back seat as it is relatively huge compared to proprietary raw formats. While some folks feel LR is way ahead of C1, the conversion quality still basically sucks when compared to what C1 puts out.

    But then perhaps my experience with LR has been overly negative. I have had LR permanently trash a file I never intended to trash, and permanently overwrite an entire import of Leica DNG raws, all with the default settings in place! Some say user error, but I say I used the software at its pre-configured, default settings, and these things should NEVER happen to files in a software in native state...

    So while it is maybe fair to say 'some' folks prefer the LR workflow, I can definitely tell you I don't. I don't like the forced library conventions and relative inability to move around and reorganize historical libraries either. Total PITA piece of software when it comes to that... Moreover, the workflow is not 'years ahead' of C1 --- in fact, I find C1's workflow significantly more logical, easier to maneuver through -- especially once you learn the short-cuts -- and light-years more efficient to use compared to LR's, at least for me.

    But at least we do agree that the quality of the C1 conversion is way ahead of LR's...


    Cheers,
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  16. #66
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    carstenw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    2,530
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post
    DNG is not fully open, as Adobe always does a "few more things" behind the scenes than other DNG converters do.
    I am not aware of that. What is it they do? Anyway, regardless of how much Adobe hides about DNG, they are still light-years ahead of Phase in the openness sweepstakes, so that is hardly a point in P1's favour.

    As a raw format, I feel DNG takes a back seat as it is relatively huge compared to proprietary raw formats.
    That depends on the implementation. I don't know which DNGs you were comparing to what. The Leica S2 is brand-new, and I wouldn't make any definitive statement based on that until a year or so from now. Leica is in general very new to the game whereas Phase is an old hand, so if you are comparing those, it says more about Leica vs. Phase than about raw formats. The DNG is the size of the image data you put in it (the rest is negligible), so it really only depends on the effort of the manufacturers in that area.

    While some folks feel LR is way ahead of C1, the conversion quality still basically sucks when compared to what C1 puts out.
    One of my earlier points was that when you say "basically sucks", then you are talking about differences which many people can barely discern. Many of the best photos every year are made with Lightroom and Aperture. We are moving in a rarefied atmosphere here, and all of the major raw developers deliver very good results compared to anything from even a couple of years ago.

    But then perhaps my experience with LR has been overly negative. I have had LR permanently trash a file I never intended to trash, and permanently overwrite an entire import of Leica DNG raws, all with the default settings in place! Some say user error, but I say I used the software at its pre-configured, default settings, and these things should NEVER happen to files in a software in native state...
    I won't try to say it hasn't happened, or that it was your own fault, but I also recall reading from people who had lost/trashed files with C1 (possibly the fault was their own). As long as a program isn't perfect, and which program is, this risk is always there. I cannot change your opinion, but Lightroom is not known for being unstable or dangerous, so I think it is safe to say that you had a very rare experience.

    So while it is maybe fair to say 'some' folks prefer the LR workflow, I can definitely tell you I don't.
    Sure, we all have our own preferences. You are very familiar with C1, which also tips the balance a bit. I find it relatively opaque, and LR transparent, but that is just me.

    But at least we do agree that the quality of the C1 conversion is way ahead of LR's...
    Well... I didn't say way ahead, and LR3 has closed the gap somewhat. The areas where I was able to do better were debayering (initial sharpness), white balance, noise reduction, and final sharpness, but I find the general tools much better in LR, including some of the newer local area tools. I haven't tried LR3 though, and it is meant to be noticeably better. I suspect that it would remove one or two objections from my personal list.

    It is not only Lightroom either; Aperture is also meant to be very good, better than Lightroom in some of the above-mentioned areas, and I am considering switching to Aperture for the next update. It costs the same, I like the development direction of Aperture better, and I like Apple as a company better than Adobe. Anyway, when LR3 is out, I will compare to Aperture and make up my mind.
    Carsten - Website

  17. #67
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by cly View Post
    what do you mean by 'eccentric' behaviour and 'chunkiness'? i'm curious as i'm toying with the insane idea* of getting closer to an artec with sinar back and whilst there is plenty of user feedback on phase backs i haven't found that much on sinar backs.

    -christoph

    * i don't know how often i have read "Abandon Hope All Ye Who Enter Here" before clicking on the link to this subforum :-).
    I believe the fact that there are so few Sinar back people here is caused by - as far as I guess- kind of bad customer relationship of Sinar in the US plus it is also a question of which SLR camera body system you want to use (Mamiya vs Hy6).
    If you talk about the back itself (for use on a tech camera) I am pretty happy with the 75LV. (if 33MP is enough for you).
    Its an older generation but big size sensor without microlenses and still very good higher ISO, IQ very natural look IMO. And the price has been pretty competitive. You also get the option of mounting all kinds of adapters easily, including the rotating adapter which you can use on Hy6 body and also on the Artec.
    Is it clunky? Probably yes, I would say all digital MF backs are clunky, leaf maybe a little less and the S2 not. I dont mind if it would be a little more or a little less clunky.
    For me it more about IQ-function-reliability-price.

  18. #68
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    2,338
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    52

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    The major 'fault' with the Sinar 75LV back I use is the way the internal mamory works in conjunction with CF card memory. Even copying files between the two is full of issues - all well catalogued. So either shoot to CFor to internal memory. if you shoot to internal memory DONT ever fill the internal memory up - this may lead to a number of issues - including not being able to download your files.

    Also careful what kind of formatting you do with the internal memory - it is a convention amongst all back makers that you do a 'format' rather than a delete to get a clean memory to use - with Sinar a format ( the wrong type) can see you lose two important files from internal mempory - and then you are in DS.

    Clunkiness is indeed relative - I compare the menu systems and user interface against Hasselbald and Phase One and Leaf - all backs I own or have used - copared to these - Sinar is clunky.

    The software menu/interface on teh 75LV is also slower and less intuative. these are qualitative issues for soem - for me it si just a clinky hassle - again compared to other systems.

    Still - al lthat being said - I am a big fan of teh Sinar files. The 75LV is a great back to use on a tech camera - because it doesnt have micro lenses and hasnt squished a gazillion pixles onto a chip in order to beat chest abotu # of pixels.

    I find Sinar colour workflow to be the easiest to us and get a true natural looking colour from. I think all teh other makers impose a standard 'look' that isnt as neutral as Sinar.

    I also like the workflow logic of Sinar - which produces a DNG file after conversion and can be openned by pretty much any piece of software with basic raw processing (temp / color ) of your choice in place.

    I cant comment about thethered shooting - I suspect expose wontbe as good or solid as Phocus or C1 - but I dont shoot tethered.


    Now overlay another set of clunkiness if you attach teh back to a Hy6. Teh Hy6 is a a beautiful camera - however its early guises is full of issues - like lcd readouts which are a jubled mess, like autofocus which doesnt work, like not being able to write which lens you use on teh metadata on teh back, like clunky exposure readings.

    Again these are all teethign problems I am sure and I look forward to getting my camera back as well as teh back all optimised and fixed.
    however given original price tags - the user shoudl have had NONE of these issues to contend with.

    Stuff you should know - the original Hys body cable release is priced at $600 Aussie down here. Can you believe that nonsense?!!! WTF! make sure you get a special tiny itsy bitsy usb cabel to do firmware upgrdes on teh body - otherwise you cant. WHY WHY two different cables to transfer data from and into??!!!! wtf twere they thinking??

    Proprietary Rollie thread sizes - what a total PAIN.
    funny hood mounting for lenses and EXPENSIVE hoods for lenses - what another RIP-OFF

    So the interface between Sinar and Hy6 and the criminally expensive Rollie pricing regimes =- all contributed to diminish the value proposition for teh combination.

    A (moderately) happy owner of Sinar/Hy6 - All said I do prefer using the Hy6 to any other body. and if Sinar fixes its software ( careful not to upgrade to version 7.03 Expose) then you have a great back and MF camera with a superb range of optics..

  19. #69
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    West Australia
    Posts
    66
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Hello Everyone,

    Despite what i said i do seem to have precipitated an argument about DNG ! Sorry !
    I am still not clear if Lightroom can read/open P1 tiffs?
    As far as the software discussion goes - I find the lightroom workflow very good.Sure there are times where I use other developers/programs for special images , but I find LR is the easiest and best solution (for me) 90% of the time.
    here are a couple of snaps of my arTec taken with M9 .. DNG alert !

  20. #70
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    West Australia
    Posts
    66
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by jps View Post
    Hello Everyone,

    Despite what i said i do seem to have precipitated an argument about DNG ! Sorry !
    I am still not clear if Lightroom can read/open P1 tiffs?
    As far as the software discussion goes - I find the lightroom workflow very good.Sure there are times where I use other developers/programs for special images , but I find LR is the easiest and best solution (for me) 90% of the time.
    here are a couple of snaps of my arTec taken with M9 .. DNG alert !
    OOOPs here are imagesAttachment 28859
    Attachment 28860

  21. #71
    Administrator Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Prescott, Arizona
    Posts
    4,492
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    367

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by jps View Post
    Hello Everyone,

    Despite what i said i do seem to have precipitated an argument about DNG ! Sorry !
    I am still not clear if Lightroom can read/open P1 tiffs?
    As far as the software discussion goes - I find the lightroom workflow very good.Sure there are times where I use other developers/programs for special images , but I find LR is the easiest and best solution (for me) 90% of the time.
    here are a couple of snaps of my arTec taken with M9 .. DNG alert !
    Well, P65+ tiffs display about a stop darker then they do in C1.
    When you attempt to view them at 100%, the preview takes about 7 seconds to "develop" which tries my patience on a 3.03GHz MacBookPro with 8G of memory.

    Lcc corrections are not picked up by lightroom since they are carries separately from the tiff file. The phase one file format that includes lcc data apparently is not supported by lightroom.
    Lightroom does not seem to pick up the lens corrections that C1 does for Phase one lenses. You can process a Phase one tiff by c1 and generate a "regular" tiff, which can them be imported into lightroom for cataloging, but the "development" has been done by C1.
    -bob

  22. #72
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    West Australia
    Posts
    66
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by PeterA View Post
    The major 'fault' with the Sinar 75LV back I use is the way the internal mamory works in conjunction with CF card memory. Even copying files between the two is full of issues - all well catalogued. So either shoot to CFor to internal memory. if you shoot to internal memory DONT ever fill the internal memory up - this may lead to a number of issues - including not being able to download your files.

    Also careful what kind of formatting you do with the internal memory - it is a convention amongst all back makers that you do a 'format' rather than a delete to get a clean memory to use - with Sinar a format ( the wrong type) can see you lose two important files from internal mempory - and then you are in DS.

    Clunkiness is indeed relative - I compare the menu systems and user interface against Hasselbald and Phase One and Leaf - all backs I own or have used - copared to these - Sinar is clunky.

    The software menu/interface on teh 75LV is also slower and less intuative. these are qualitative issues for soem - for me it si just a clinky hassle - again compared to other systems.

    Still - al lthat being said - I am a big fan of teh Sinar files. The 75LV is a great back to use on a tech camera - because it doesnt have micro lenses and hasnt squished a gazillion pixles onto a chip in order to beat chest abotu # of pixels.

    I find Sinar colour workflow to be the easiest to us and get a true natural looking colour from. I think all teh other makers impose a standard 'look' that isnt as neutral as Sinar.

    I also like the workflow logic of Sinar - which produces a DNG file after conversion and can be openned by pretty much any piece of software with basic raw processing (temp / color ) of your choice in place.

    I cant comment about thethered shooting - I suspect expose wontbe as good or solid as Phocus or C1 - but I dont shoot tethered.


    Now overlay another set of clunkiness if you attach teh back to a Hy6. Teh Hy6 is a a beautiful camera - however its early guises is full of issues - like lcd readouts which are a jubled mess, like autofocus which doesnt work, like not being able to write which lens you use on teh metadata on teh back, like clunky exposure readings.

    Again these are all teethign problems I am sure and I look forward to getting my camera back as well as teh back all optimised and fixed.
    however given original price tags - the user shoudl have had NONE of these issues to contend with.

    Stuff you should know - the original Hys body cable release is priced at $600 Aussie down here. Can you believe that nonsense?!!! WTF! make sure you get a special tiny itsy bitsy usb cabel to do firmware upgrdes on teh body - otherwise you cant. WHY WHY two different cables to transfer data from and into??!!!! wtf twere they thinking??

    Proprietary Rollie thread sizes - what a total PAIN.
    funny hood mounting for lenses and EXPENSIVE hoods for lenses - what another RIP-OFF

    So the interface between Sinar and Hy6 and the criminally expensive Rollie pricing regimes =- all contributed to diminish the value proposition for teh combination.

    A (moderately) happy owner of Sinar/Hy6 - All said I do prefer using the Hy6 to any other body. and if Sinar fixes its software ( careful not to upgrade to version 7.03 Expose) then you have a great back and MF camera with a superb range of optics..
    Peter,

    All true. However whenever I think of buying another system (I confess to being a gear junkie ) I just pick up the Hy6 with the 110 lens and look thru the WLF -- nothing else that I know of compares .

    JOHN

  23. #73
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    West Australia
    Posts
    66
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob View Post
    Well, P65+ tiffs display about a stop darker then they do in C1.
    When you attempt to view them at 100%, the preview takes about 7 seconds to "develop" which tries my patience on a 3.03GHz MacBookPro with 8G of memory.

    Lcc corrections are not picked up by lightroom since they are carries separately from the tiff file. The phase one file format that includes lcc data apparently is not supported by lightroom.
    Lightroom does not seem to pick up the lens corrections that C1 does for Phase one lenses. You can process a Phase one tiff by c1 and generate a "regular" tiff, which can them be imported into lightroom for cataloging, but the "development" has been done by C1.
    -bob
    Bob

    Thanks for that. All is clear now !

    Cheers JOHN

  24. #74
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    253
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    peterA and t_streng - thanks a lot for your replies re possible issues with the sinar back!

    indeed, it's either the artec or another tec camera i'm interested in. being able to rotate the back is something i'd really appreciate and the same holds for a sliding back. and that always brings me back to the artec. (the cambo wrs might be another option but there isn't the kind of sliding back i'd get with the artec).

    the resolution of the 75LV would be adequate - and looking at the file quality of my m8 and m9, i don't think that a somehow dated sensor is a problem. the leaf, being rotatable, might be an alternative but then i don't know if i would get a workflow as convenient as the sinar one when it comes to white shading files (assuming it's true what i have read about it :-). but then again: i haven't used the sinar software and i happen to like c1 - which i could use with a leaf back.

    it's probably time for a test drive ...

    -christoph

  25. #75
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by cly View Post
    peterA and t_streng - thanks a lot for your replies re possible issues with the sinar back!

    indeed, it's either the artec or another tec camera i'm interested in. being able to rotate the back is something i'd really appreciate and the same holds for a sliding back. and that always brings me back to the artec. (the cambo wrs might be another option but there isn't the kind of sliding back i'd get with the artec).

    the resolution of the 75LV would be adequate - and looking at the file quality of my m8 and m9, i don't think that a somehow dated sensor is a problem. the leaf, being rotatable, might be an alternative but then i don't know if i would get a workflow as convenient as the sinar one when it comes to white shading files (assuming it's true what i have read about it :-). but then again: i haven't used the sinar software and i happen to like c1 - which i could use with a leaf back.

    it's probably time for a test drive ...

    -christoph
    test drive is a good idea.
    The SInar software is not complete intuitive-so give it alittle time. After getting used it works just fine (for me).

  26. #76
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    171
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Tested and played with the artec - well done - NO flares with HR40mm. amazing with HR23mm.

    Lens shade like Lee's - quick release - adapter on each lens nicely done!

    Now just needing to get a DB that works!

    Well DONE - arTec!

    BTW: Greetings to "JPS".

  27. #77
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Would love to get my hands on one to test, but extremely difficult to find one anywhere in the states...
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  28. #78
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post
    Would love to get my hands on one to test, but extremely difficult to find one anywhere in the states...
    As a (half)business guy I even could get kind of mad how Sinar treats their potential customers in the US. Such a nice and innovative company and then they dont get their customer relationship going in the US.
    I would recommend anybody who is interested to directly call (not mail) Sinar Switzerland. Nice people over there.

  29. #79
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    2,338
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    52

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    I can confirm that Sinar ( in Australia) now is run by a fantastic person - a real pleasure to deal with and knowledgeable not only about Sinar - but also about photography- as in real photography.

    So it saddens me to hear someone like Jack say that he cant even source a Sinar in the US (of all places) to try.

    Seriously they are shooting themseklves in the foot - best products and worst marketing strategies in the largest market...

  30. #80
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    171
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post
    Would love to get my hands on one to test, but extremely difficult to find one anywhere in the states...
    I see your listing.

    You will LOVE the arTec - may end up doing some horse-trading (just kidding)!

    Many are saying the same - hard to get their hands on one . Perhaps I can convince my Sinar pimp friend (distributor - VERY lovely guy and knowledgeable as per PeterA comment immediately above) to loan me one so I can fly home to LA and see how many I can sign up for one.

    Better, Jack, coming from you end is 40% cheaper on Qantas. Everything is so expensive here that's why I ended up buying Cambo 23D - the weight could anchored a QEII!

  31. #81
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Actually, I may try and surprise my wife with a trip to NZ to visit some friends after your winter ends. A few days in and around Sydney on the way over or back would certainly be on the schedule, so mayhaps we can make that happen --- and it's good bet I won't see an ArTech between now and then over here...

    But seriously, at least for me, I'm 98% convinced I want a full view cam with movements at each end, and for me that decision is made: the Arca M-2 with Rotaslide. First lenses are either Rodie 40HR, 70HR and 135 APO, or Schneider 47XL, 72 and 135...
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  32. #82
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    171
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post
    Actually, I may try and surprise my wife with a trip to NZ to visit some friends after your winter ends. A few days in and around Sydney on the way over or back would certainly be on the schedule, so mayhaps we can make that happen --- and it's good bet I won't see an ArTech between now and then over here...
    ...do line yourself up with the chap at Capture Scan Print in Sydney(http://www.capturescanprint.com/) (hope I'm allow to provide the link). I think the commission may be that if I sell 10x I get one free from Sinar (..just kidding) - all helps are pro bono and any offences are to further my humility.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post
    But seriously, at least for me, I'm 98% convinced I want a full view cam with movements at each end, and for me that decision is made: the Arca M-2 with Rotaslide. First lenses are either Rodie 40HR, 70HR and 135 APO, or Schneider 47XL, 72 and 135...
    Wow... Arca M-2. What recession back home in US let alone CAL state! Bet you the arTec is lighter to carry in your backpack.

  33. #83
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,347
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    12

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Flesher View Post
    I'm 98% convinced I want a full view cam with movements at each end, and for me that decision is made: the Arca M-2 with Rotaslide.
    but on the rear the M2 provides lateral and vertical movements only, AFAIK, i.e. no T/S on the rear... AFAIK.
    I am finding those cameras (M2, Techno ...) hard to focus at infinity, especially with wide angles. If the focus goes slighty beyond infinity everything is soft. This is why helical mount is realtively easy to handle.
    On the other hand: if you have no trouble with focussing near/at infinity this is a beautiful camera!

  34. #84
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Marseille, FRANCE
    Posts
    972
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    M line two : Barely over 2 kg (4,4 lbs)http://www.precisioncameraworks.com/Media/Mline2.pdf

  35. #85
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Yes, I see on the 2 they've removed tilt and swing from the rear standard. Looks like now the M-2 has front and rear rise, rear shift and front swing and tilt. Actually, for my needs, this is perfect balance --- helps keep things aligned and keeps the weight manageable, while maintaining all the movements I regularly use on each standard. Still like it as my preferred choice right now.
    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  36. #86
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,347
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    12

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by thomas View Post
    Does anyone use the arTec lens shade?
    http://www.sinar.ch/en/products/acce...ompendiummaske...
    I've ordered that thing to mount it on my Cambo WRS. Man, great and useful little accessory! By now I have just tried it with the regular Cambo lens panel; no trouble at all, of course, as the lens is fixed. Sometime next week I'll get my first lens mounted in a T/S panel. I guess the lens shade will also work fine on that... will see. Also ordered the White Shading Diffusor that can be mounted on the lens adapter rings... so I don't have to hold that white plate in one hand anymore... which is always a bit cumbersome. Nice!
    Last edited by thomas; 21st March 2010 at 13:51.

  37. #87
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    171
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by thomas View Post
    but on the rear the M2 provides lateral and vertical movements only, AFAIK, i.e. no T/S on the rear... AFAIK.
    I am finding those cameras (M2, Techno ...) hard to focus at infinity, especially with wide angles. If the focus goes slighty beyond infinity everything is soft. This is why helical mount is realtively easy to handle.
    On the other hand: if you have no trouble with focussing near/at infinity this is a beautiful camera!
    I agree with you that at infinity w/ my HR35 on my then Cambo 23D, even tested with the Sinar. That's why I was looking at the arTec but ended with Cambo WRS as I no longer have the sort of briefs demanding such IQ - all shooting with Canon WA (here in AU).

    (Shame on me still rebuking myself for naughty dreams with an arTec.) ... aaah ... one day...

    Again... your artec lens shade idea is absolutely a gem!

  38. #88
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,347
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    12

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by rhsu View Post
    I agree with you that at infinity w/ my HR35 on my then Cambo 23D, even tested with the Sinar...
    I have no real experience using a rail camera with a DB!! But I know that it's literally impossible to focus e.g. the 47XL at a distance slightly closer than infinity, i.e. almost but not quite infinity. Everything appers to be in focus at these distances (but, of course, it is not in the actual capture). So I think it's somehow a nightmare if you have to focus a wide angle on a rail camera unless you shoot tethered. Closer distances are relatively easy to focus on the GG. With the 47XL at distances from around 8-10 meters and further (but nearer than infinity) I use a laser distometer. Actually works quite well if you know the lens.
    And BTW: FORGET any DOF indication for the 47XL, it simply doesn't work if you are really demanding WRT to focus.

    (Shame on me still rebuking myself for naughty dreams with an arTec.) ... aaah ... one day...
    me too :-) if Sinar would have offered Contax mount from the very beginning I'd use an arTec today. I talked to the guys at Sinar the other day and apparently Contax mount is at least not without the realms of possibility as there were some other photographers asking for it as well. Obviously they would even think about mounting a Digitar for me (I'm fine with the Rodenstock line but I'd like to keep the 47XL resp. upcoming 43XL as they provide really huge image circles).
    On the other hand the WRS is really a very, very nice compact camera offering a lot of features. And as long as you don't have too much trouble working without a sliding back it will do fine. Very fine actually.

    Again... your artec lens shade idea is absolutely a gem!
    not really an "idea". I just scrolled through the accessory items on the Sinar site and found the lens shade. As it is mounted on the lens it's obvious that you can use it on all large format lenses.
    It has almost the same measurements than the WRS body (same height and a bit wider)... so if you stand in front of the camera you won't see the camera at all :-)

  39. #89
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Jupiter, Fla.
    Posts
    1,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Looking forward to shooting with the ArTec pretty much all day in Tampa on Thursday, March 25th. I'm not much of an architectural shooter but I will try to get some decent shots and post them up. Tampa does have some nice architectural subject matter... I just hope the weather cooperates. If there's anyone reading this who would like to join us please pm me and I'll see what I can do.

  40. #90
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    171
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by thomas View Post
    ...not really an "idea". I just scrolled through the accessory items on the Sinar site and found the lens shade. As it is mounted on the lens it's obvious that you can use it on all large format lenses
    ...I know what you mean "scrolling" through the accessory. I like the Alpa brass soft shutter release for the copal. Couldn't get a price from them as spare parts.

    I'm returning to play with the artec again and see what horse trading I can do. I'm going to convince my artec dealer to loan me his unit for my Nullabor/Wilpena Pound expendition - just for pleasure. google those places and you will know why. I was there 20yrs ago with my 6x6 Biogon but got the wrong film to capture the red landscapes - I ONLY had T-Max film!

  41. #91
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Anyone here any experience with the 40mm HR lens forthe Artec?
    I am thinking of exchanging my 35mm HR for the 40mm with the larger image circle.
    With the 35 I can shift around up to 12mm but would like more.

  42. #92
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    1,347
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    12

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by t_streng View Post
    Anyone here any experience with the 40mm HR lens forthe Artec?
    Jack: http://forum.getdpi.com/forum/showthread.php?t=13238

  43. #93
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    171
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by t_streng View Post
    Anyone here any experience with the 40mm HR lens forthe Artec?
    I am thinking of exchanging my 35mm HR for the 40mm with the larger image circle.
    With the 35 I can shift around up to 12mm but would like more.
    I spent over 2 hrs last Tues playing with artec on HR40mm. We were using Sinar e75 DB and plenty of movements. I'm heading over again to play with the artec more - and won't be shy this time. I'm still bent in sticking with P45+ - because I do not know enough of P65+ and the newer generation Sinar and Leaf DBs.

    What is it specifically you want to know? No doubt there would be plenty of feedbacks in due course.

    We definitely test for flares - in direct sunlight = NO flares. Of course we didn't purposely shoot to create flares...

    We also tilt more than 2* deg. We didn't do stitching. Sinar DB seems okay.

    May be DAvid K can enlighten us as he is going out shooting Thurs.

  44. #94
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Jupiter, Fla.
    Posts
    1,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by rhsu View Post
    May be DAvid K can enlighten us as he is going out shooting Thurs.
    If there's anything specific anyone would like tested I will do my best. Unfortunately, I'm completely inexperienced with tech cameras but at least will have someone with me who knows the ropes. I'll be using it on my Sinar e75LV but don't know yet what lenses will be available.

  45. #95
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    171
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by David K View Post
    If there's anything specific anyone would like tested I will do my best. Unfortunately, I'm completely inexperienced with tech cameras but at least will have someone with me who knows the ropes. I'll be using it on my Sinar e75LV but don't know yet what lenses will be available.
    I think "t streng" wants the HR40mm tested and pushed hard against on par to his DB.

    I just want a good working DB if I am going to horse-trade my RS for an artec. Otherwise, no point in getting an artec! (What good is 20/20 vision with fuzzy brain?)

    What's good enough for you is good enough for me to demo the intended purpose. I wouldn't mind seeing Tampa FL again!

  46. #96
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,623
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    The 35HR is very sharp even wide open.
    I am interested if the 40HR is also very sharp wide open and if I could expect overall the same performance as the 40HR .

  47. #97
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Jupiter, Fla.
    Posts
    1,967
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Pretty sure the lens will be the non-HR 40. I'm going to try some shots around the University of Tampa (where my daughter is a second year student) which has some really beautiful buildings, campus, etc. Get to hug and kiss my daughter after shooting... a nice fringe benefit

  48. #98
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    171
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by t_streng View Post
    The 35HR is very sharp even wide open.
    I am interested if the 40HR is also very sharp wide open and if I could expect overall the same performance as the 40HR .
    When I go over to have a further play with the artec, I'll have a play with the said lens fully open and with movements. Of course, what you are asking need not be via artec so others should be able to contribute.

  49. #99
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    West Australia
    Posts
    66
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by rhsu View Post
    When I go over to have a further play with the artec, I'll have a play with the said lens fully open and with movements. Of course, what you are asking need not be via artec so others should be able to contribute.
    Hello,

    I would be most interested to see your report on the 40mm . I have the 28,45 and 90 lenses and use with the sinar 75 back. You are right about the Australian agent - David is tremendously knowledgeable and helpful !

    Cheers JOHN

  50. #100
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    171
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Sinar arTec available for Hasselblad V, H, Phase One/Mamiya backs

    Quote Originally Posted by jps View Post
    Hello,

    I would be most interested to see your report on the 40mm . I have the 28,45 and 90 lenses and use with the sinar 75 back. You are right about the Australian agent - David is tremendously knowledgeable and helpful !

    Cheers JOHN
    John,

    At a special price of just over of A$10k (export), I am NOT going to tempt fate (but I will next wk) in becoming the next victim in ownership ("Come into my parlour, said the spider to the fly").

    ...So if I remember what I did last Tues with the HR40, on the Sinar 75, I don't think I saw any obvious adversities - other than my focusing and TS movements - as I was getting adjusted to GG slider. I know I had it wide open and to f8. but of course, the old rule of thumb in stopping down.

    Someone had mentioned about the "moustache" on the MTF chart.

    David of Sinar AU is actually going to play with the request - so to allow him to fudge the results - (just kidding).

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •