Site Sponsors
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 51 to 100 of 165

Thread: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

  1. #51
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    4,043
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1253

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    and there is the aptus 12, 80 mpx, ( $12k cheaper than the IQ180) and av very nice platform with the perks of a rotatable sensor and tilting LCD (for one of the versions)

  2. #52
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    3,275
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    7

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by johnnygoesdigital View Post
    To invest in MFD is an oxymoron! Whatever system one purchases, the camera will depreciate considerably.
    I think most people refer to "investing" in this context (hobby spending) taking into account returns on investment beyond straight resale value of the equipment later on.

    It's like saying you're going to train to climb Mount Kilimanjaro and you're investing in a good pair (or 6) of shoes and a personal trainer.

    If you're going to put considerable time (the most valuable asset we have), effort, and emotion into a hobby it makes sense to place a similar (monetary) investment in equipment and training that will increase your enjoyment of the hobby either by
    - increasing the maximum performance you can achieve (e.g. coming as close to that max still being on you and your skills/effort/hard-work)
    - making the activity more pure/true/tactile/viscerally enjoyable (e.g. a scuba diver buying the best dive-mask for the clearest view of the wild-life)
    - allowing you to spend more of your time doing the part of the activity you enjoy rather than the part of the activity you don't enjoy (e.g. renting a golf cart so you spend more time hitting balls and drinking and less time going from point A to point B)

    Of course that financial investment has to be relative to your overall disposable income.

    To me part of the joy of shooting landscape with a tech camera is the WAY you shoot. The slower, more methodical, more mechanical, older school, precise and tactile shooting that comes with a tech camera is part of the fun for me. As a profession it would be a point-of-question: you can't produce as many shots/day with a tech camera as a dSLR - so is the increased quality and flexibility and decreased time in front of the computer later worth it to your business? But as a hobby it's a very different question - in many ways who cares how many shots you can accomplish per day. The greater question is how good will those shots be (to you) and how much will you enjoy creating them at the time, and viewing/sharing them after the fact.

    Another way of saying this is that in professional photography the capture of the image is often reduced to a means to an end - the delivery of an image to a client who will pay for it. In hobby photography the journey - the process of capturing the image - is just as important as the process.

    Some hobbyists will prefer a camera which is the easiest to get an ok image. But to me that's like saying a hobby runner should forgo actually running the miles and just jump in their car and drive to the finish line. I prefer a camera which is more an extension of my body and allows me to interact with the landscape rather than just frame it up and snap a shot. I feel more involved in the making of the image with a tech camera than I do looking through a live-view on a 5DII and doing things like pan-and-stitch and focus stacking on the computer later on. Getting a great image on a tech camera is more challenging, more engaging, and is slower than with more automatic and general-purpose cameras, but that makes it very satisfying to me - the fact that it produces the best possible quality is just a bonus.

    It's the same reason that when I print cyanotypes using a 160 year old recipe of chemistry and sun-power rather than use photoshop and an inkjet. It's just more enjoyable to me.

    Now to be clear I am openly biased as we (Capture Integration) make our living by selling the equipment you're talking about as solutions including training/support/advice for photographers both professional and hobbyists. But my bottom line is if you have your basic needs met, have a reserve for the unforeseen, cared for your family, contributed toward the well-being of your community, and you still have money to spare then you should spend your excess in whatever way you think will bring you the most enjoyment (assuming it isn't harming others) and not worry too much about what other people think or what other people can afford.

    Doug Peterson (e-mail Me)
    __________________

    Head of Technical Services, Capture Integration
    Phase One Partner of the Year
    Leaf, Leica, Cambo, Arca Swiss, Canon, Apple, Profoto, Broncolor, Eizo & More

    National: 877.217.9870 *| *Cell: 740.707.2183
    Newsletter | RSS Feed
    Buy Capture One 6 at 10% off

  3. #53
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Houston TX USA
    Posts
    273
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    To the OP

    for me, as a hobbyist, I have a nice prudent reserve, save for retirement, contribute to cub scouts, and my local religious affiliation, ( does not really matter which one ) ..... due to good education and hard work, I have a surplus, some goes to home improvements, others on camping gear and such, and with what's left, it's mine to spend. Even then, I am prudent, I have to rent a studio, pay models and such .... all that said, I'm working with one of the dealers on this board to get a back that FITS MY NEEDS! I print a vanity book once a year, and some 16X20s. I can tell the difference between a D3X and my lowly ZD, if the thing worked as well as a phase, there would be no need to upgrade. However, after a year of shooting, there are just some things it does not do. So, with that surplus, I will upgrade. NB .... I shot MF film, then a really cheap DB for a year, and then upgrade, for my prudent nature a 80meg back is off the deep end, even if you do have several million laying around. However, it's still cheaper than falling off a Harley!

    Dave

  4. #54
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    jonoslack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    East Anglia & Cornwall (UK)
    Posts
    11,778
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Hi Jim
    Of course it's justifiable if you want it and you've got the dosh - no question.
    On the other hand, if you're moving from a Canon or Nikon FF camera there is really a lot to learn.
    The real reason I haven't gone to MF is that my time is limited, and I'd rather spend that limited time in taking pictures with kit I understand rather than learning how to use new kit.
    On this basis, if I did decide to go MF I'd be more likely to get something like the S2, which would be familiar territory (but that's a different question).

    But my caveats are all about time resources - not about money. If you want it - then go for it

    Just this guy you know

  5. #55
    Jim2
    Guest

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by djonesii View Post
    for my prudent nature a 80meg back is off the deep end, even if you do have several million laying around. However, it's still cheaper than falling off a Harley!

    Dave
    Dave, thanks for sharing your thoughts here. Do you mind me asking, are you currently already retired?

  6. #56
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    171
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Late into the post, but if it is the resultant effects that you are after (probably more likely the case) then go for it. Hobbiest or pro the only difference is the latter gets (in theory) their money back or earn income from it. The former, 100% pleasure and joy of taking photos with a beautiful conclusion to admire upon by all without worrying how to pay it off or whether it gets payed off or not!

  7. #57
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    2,338
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    52

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    If one is asking the quesiton then one shouldn't.

    All the answers are other people's thought bubbles reflecting (quite naturally) their own dispositions.

    If what other people are using to make images really matters - then I suggest the less money spent the better.

  8. #58
    Senior Member stephengilbert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Santa Monica, CA
    Posts
    2,272
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    I agree with Peter, and would add that if you can't decide for yourself, asking strangers their opinions isn't the best way to make a decision. As a died in the wool gearhead, I find that I only ask for people's opinions when I'm looking for a reason to justify what I already want to do. If you've already decided to spend the money, you've come to the right place for advice.

  9. #59
    Subscriber and Workshop Member MGrayson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,575
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    4

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by stephengilbert View Post
    I agree with Peter, and would add that if you can't decide for yourself, asking strangers their opinions isn't the best way to make a decision. As a died in the wool gearhead, I find that I only ask for people's opinions when I'm looking for a reason to justify what I already want to do.
    Well, yes, asking ordinary strangers would be a bad idea, but these here are GetDPI strangers. We're special!

    Matt

  10. #60
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,083
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    6

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by MGrayson View Post
    Well, yes, asking ordinary strangers would be a bad idea, but these here are GetDPI strangers. We're special!

    Matt
    Special strangers who can really make anyone spend money in a flesh, i am sure if i have $10k and ask about a medium format here on GetDPI, i will end up that i want to have $30k or more, because i will have many comments as no need to think about MF if i don't have that much or i have to buy used or even buy the cheaper option of MF and upgrade later, in fact i found out that upgrading later for me is more wasting money than buying one high end expensive, so most comments will show that with little budget i will buy something less than others and they will always talk about how amazing those new gear over the old one which i have, like saying buy a Ferrari car now model 2005 or another sports car not in Ferrari league and later buy that new Ferrari model 2012 or 2013, at 2014 when i buy Ferrari 2011/2012 people will say that Ferrari 2014/2015 is superior to Ferrari 2011 and then i will always think to upgrade which will cost me more than what i spent before.
    I upgraded my H3DII-39 to H4D-60 last year, i found out that upgraded saved me a lot than i upgrade my H3D to even H4D-40/50 after one year or 2.
    Tareq

  11. #61
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    4,043
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1253

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    i'm with peter and stephen; ask for gear advice, not moral opinions

  12. #62
    Subscriber & Workshop Member GrahamWelland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    5,801
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    564

    Exclamation Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by MGrayson View Post
    Well, yes, asking ordinary strangers would be a bad idea, but these here are GetDPI strangers. We're special!

    Matt
    No strangers here, just "enablers"
    Remember: adventure before dementia!

    As Oscar Wilde said, "my tastes are simple, I only like the best"

  13. #63
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    32° 31' 37.06" N, 111° 6' 0.9" W
    Posts
    4,333
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    I've never once made a recommendation that someone else not spend their money...
    Don Libby
    Iron Creek Photography
    Blog
    Tucson AZ

  14. #64
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,083
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    6

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by Don Libby View Post
    I've never once made a recommendation that someone else not spend their money...
    As you did
    Tareq

  15. #65
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Delhi, India
    Posts
    44
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim2 View Post
    Going along this line of thinking for a second....
    - a used P65+ costs the same as IQ140 which would you choose.

    I'm smack in the middle of deciding that now. If I was a tech cam shooter all the time than the IQ in any flavor


    - The difference of either of the above to IQ180 is about $17-20K - a small extra(??) considering the doubling of resolution

    MPX are not everything

    - If I get IQ140 (or P65+) now and upgrade, my then used IQ140 would have depreciated in value, making the upgrade more costly in the future, unless perhaps upgrade to IQ180 when they have a 100MP back - in what.... 3 years?

    Certainly tougher money wise going from the 40 sensors to the bigger ones. Need to remember also upgrade programs are designed to get you to upgrade so the depreciation value on the street is different than the upgrade programs. The upgrade programs always offer less depreciation on your current gear. The basic idea here is keep you in the system.

    Another idea -
    - Wait for the influx of traded up P65+ to 'flood' the market (haha?) and pick them up at a much cheaper (??) price

    How many P65+'s were they selling in 2008-2010?

    A lot don't have those numbers but most backs wind up in education programs and rental houses. Think about this for a second Phase really does not want a lot of used backs on the market since they could lose new sales instead. Not a Phase thing overall but all manufactures do not want to flood the market with used product so they will off load them for other things. This is very normal.

    I'm not sure why people would go with IQ160 over IQ180 when the difference is not that much.

    On the upgrade path no doubt and for resale value the 180 will have more value so yes this is a tough call and Phase as you can see by there pricing are pushing the 180 and that will reflect in there units sold.

    Tough choice!
    Just a thought. You have no experience in digital MF. There is a lot more to it than shooting a DSLR. If you go through some threads, the complexities of the system, the software and time spent in learning MF is explained. So if you want to go the MF way, why not

    1. Rent out a system for say one month. Use it thoroughly.

    OR

    2. If you must have a NEW System, get an inexpensive 40 MPIX system - Pentax, Hasselblad, Phase. The price of acquisition will be 10K - 24K max.

    If MF works for you you can buy/upgrade, if not you have lost much less than the depreciation on a 55K system.

    One more word of caution, there was a thread where the steep learning curve of Digital Technical Camera was discussed. The reason being an unsatisfied new comer to MFDB world.

    I would do a thorough research followed by real life experience via a rental route, even if money was of no consequence, just to ensure that MFBD on a Tech camera was my scene. Though all of us welcome converts from DSLR to MFDB, none want to see a disillusioned and/or disgruntled user.

  16. #66
    Jim2
    Guest

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by ajoyroy View Post
    One more word of caution, there was a thread where the steep learning curve of Digital Technical Camera was discussed. The reason being an unsatisfied new comer to MFDB world.
    Thanks for this. Can you please point me to this thread? Thanks! I'm curious as to what others might be dissatisfied about.

  17. #67
    Workshop Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Houston TX USA
    Posts
    273
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    FYI ..... I'm not retired, in fact, not even close, still got a good 25 years in front of me. Prudent does not mean dull! Spend 15 years overseas as an expat, and that put me on a pretty solid footing. Did grad school while working, and came out with no debt!

    Dave

  18. #68
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    296
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    yes if your hobby is spending money

  19. #69
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    860
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    76

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Is buying a 55k camera justifiable.. in the name of hobby?

    Most definitely - if you can afford it. I do agree with others which recommend you try the digital MF options before you buy. It is more technically demanding than a typical dSLR, but good technique is rewarded.

    You probably wouldn't even ask yourself this question if you were thinking of buying a boat, airplane, vehicle, etc. It's all a matter of perspective.

  20. #70
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by lowep View Post
    Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    yes if your hobby is spending money
    Or making money is more like it ...

    -Marc

  21. #71
    Workshop Member kuau's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Park City, UT
    Posts
    1,071
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    34

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by TEBnewyork View Post
    I only use a technical camera and sold my DF body/lenses.
    For the landscape shooter, to get the very best IQ off of MF tech/view is the way to go what Terry got is my "DREAM" camera, Phase DF is a nice system, but it's more of a oversized DSLR so it more versatile, Great for Fashion, Studio work, etc. Sure you can shot landscape to, but have to be aware of the limitations, I guess it all gets down to what you like to shoot.
    If Phase ever gets around to releasing some more T/S lenses then it would be a very good all around system and I would for sure probably sell my Pentax 645D, which is all I could afford and have to work around all the limitations of MF, shallow DOF, Soft corners when shooting wide angle, etc. Yet at the same time what a camera for 10K, Now if they would only release some more digital optimized lenses, which I am starting to believe is that is a "marketing term" Manufacturers should really call them, Lens tested and verified to work with Digital, "Tested" meaning each lens tested before it gets shipped out to dealers and avoid the "bad copy" syndrome.

    Steven
    Steven Kornreich
    www.kuau.com

  22. #72
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    206
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by dougpetersonci View Post

    Some hobbyists will prefer a camera which is the easiest to get an ok image. But to me that's like saying a hobby runner should forgo actually running the miles and just jump in their car and drive to the finish line.
    Doug is right...I never understood the mentality of doing things half-assed. If something is worth doing then it's worth doing right IMHO

    For whatever it's worth, my understanding is that Steiglitz didn't really differentiate between hobbyists and professionals. He considered that their primary motivations and intentions towards the medium were similar and that led them to make compromises. He felt that they tended to make photographic decisions based on practical aspects like money, convenience (today we might call it workflow) status, or leisure. The fine arts could certainly influence them in some way but were not considered their primary influence, therefore, they could not claim that producing art was their true motivation. He considered the photographers that were attempting to become Fine Artists as being motivated by factors that were different from the "kodakers" or "camera clubs" or commercial photographers.

    The point I'm trying to get at is if money is a motivating factor then it's not practical for a hobbyist to spend a small fortune on a camera system. However, if working to the highest level of craftsmanship in an effort to become a better artist is the primary motivating factor, then there is no limit to the resources that could justifiably be spent to achieve the goal.

  23. #73
    New Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    14
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    The way I see it is that if you are agonizing over it, and if you are needing justification, then you probably should not buy it.

    From what I have seen, people who buy big ticket items such as this for pure enjoyment usually don't care how much it really cost. The price of it is nothing more than an afterthought. These guys will laugh about losing 50k on a single bet in Vegas. They will lit up numerous 100 dollar bills just for amusement. I know it is sickening, but that is how much money they happen to have.

    Now, if you think that investing that 50k is a possible option, then you need this money. You should invest it. I am almost certain that you will have a buyer's remorse.

    Sorry to be a buzzkil, but trying to be a devil's advocate here for a change.
    Last edited by Nubi; 12th April 2011 at 16:50.

  24. #74
    Jim2
    Guest

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Ha! I was reading Wikipedia on "Buyer's Remorse" and Cognitive Dissonance. This one came from the latter:

    Cognitive dissonance is an uncomfortable feeling caused by holding conflicting ideas simultaneously. The theory of cognitive dissonance proposes that people have a motivational drive to reduce dissonance. They do this by changing their attitudes, beliefs, and actions.[2] Dissonance is also reduced by justifying, blaming, and denying. It is one of the most influential and extensively studied theories in social psychology.

    Experience can clash with expectations, as, for example, with buyer's remorse following the purchase of an expensive item. In a state of dissonance, people may feel surprise,[2] dread, guilt, anger, or embarrassment. People are biased to think of their choices as correct, despite any contrary evidence. This bias gives dissonance theory its predictive power, shedding light on otherwise puzzling irrational and destructive behavior.

    A classical example of this idea (and the origin of the expression "sour grapes") is expressed in the fable The Fox and the Grapes by Aesop (ca. 620–564 BCE). In the story, a fox sees some high-hanging grapes and wishes to eat them. When the fox is unable to think of a way to reach them, he surmises that the grapes are probably not worth eating, as they must not be ripe or that they are sour. This example follows a pattern: one desires something, finds it unattainable, and reduces one's dissonance by criticizing it.
    And this one is also interesting, on the other side of the coin:
    Post-purchase rationalization is a phenomenon whereby someone who purchases an expensive product or service overlooks any faults or defects in order to justify their purchase. Expensive purchases often involve a lot of careful research and deliberation, and many consumers will often refuse to admit that their decision was made in poor judgement. Many purchasing decisions are made emotionally, based on factors such as brand-loyalty and advertising, and so are often rationalized retrospectively in an attempt to justify the choice.

  25. #75
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    35
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    I'm 25 myself and could not have jumped to MF had it not been for a used h3dii-39.... Image quality alone is amazing when jumping from a 1ds III or 5d II.... Although I didn't have 55k to spend, it would have been spent buying the lesser of the backs i.e IQ140 and just building up the lens arsenal, as I can personally say from experience that lenses retain value while the price of a sensor keeps going down and down.

  26. #76
    Jim2
    Guest

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaime R View Post
    I'm 25 myself and could not have jumped to MF had it not been for a used h3dii-39.... Image quality alone is amazing when jumping from a 1ds III or 5d II.... Although I didn't have 55k to spend, it would have been spent buying the lesser of the backs i.e IQ140 and just building up the lens arsenal, as I can personally say from experience that lenses retain value while the price of a sensor keeps going down and down.
    I keep thinking about one of these
    - not buying anything (might also regret this decision)
    - get the ultimate IQ180
    - get the P65+
    - get the IQ140 (same price as P65+ but the IQ seems to be more pleasurable to use - heck how often would one need to check focus... every time? film ppl didn't use to be able to check focus / exposure / anything)

  27. #77
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    206
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim2 View Post
    Ha! I was reading Wikipedia on "Buyer's Remorse" and Cognitive Dissonance. This one came from the latter:
    The danger in using psychology to assess the behavior of other people is that the person making the observation is often projecting his own feelings onto others. Sometimes it works, but sometimes it doesn't. For example, those that have gone through buyer's remorse could be more likely to assume that others will experience the same. Those that console themselves in the presence of unattainable items by criticizing them (sour grapes) could be quicker to assume that others offer criticism for similar reasons.

  28. #78
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,387
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike M View Post
    Doug is right...I never understood the mentality of doing things half-assed. If something is worth doing then it's worth doing right IMHO.
    You fell for the oldest sales line in the business. Gosh, you must be a sales persons dream when you roll up to the showroom.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike M View Post
    However, if working to the highest level of craftsmanship in an effort to become a better artist is the primary motivating factor, then there is no limit to the resources that could justifiably be spent to achieve the goal.
    Come on.....the quality of the camera equipment makes ZERO difference to the ability to be a better artist. It might overcome some technical boundaries but if you believe it will make you a better artist spending more and more money on the latest kit then I'd give up photography now. However your comment may be a result of your statement above........ (said in a salesman's voice) "you really gotta have the best, sir $$$$$"

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim2 View Post
    I keep thinking about one of these
    - not buying anything (might also regret this decision)
    - get the ultimate IQ180
    - get the P65+
    - get the IQ140 (same price as P65+ but the IQ seems to be more pleasurable to use - heck how often would one need to check focus... every time? film ppl didn't use to be able to check focus / exposure / anything)
    I think you have missed one important back off your list, if not the most relevant and may possibly be the best one to start you off.

    -P45+. 1:1 crop with 39MP and tech camera friendly and can be picked up as cheap a chips now. Many using P45's on here for landscape with tech cameras.

    And while you considering P backs you should also check out used P40+ now the IQ140's have been launched. There should be quite a few turning up shortly and they use the latest Dalsa chips as in the IQ140. Just have a look in the "Fun with MF images" topic on this forum at some of the shots Guy has taken with his P40+ and Alpa to see how stunning this combo can be.

  29. #79
    New Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    14
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    If you have not done so already, reckon on spending a substantial amount on a workstation, monitor, printer, colour management system, tripod + head etc. This forum and the Mac Performance Guide will show you how to drop a lot of money on the peripherals ;-)

  30. #80
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Massachusetts and Vermont
    Posts
    947
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by dougpetersonci View Post
    I
    To me part of the joy of shooting landscape with a tech camera is the WAY you shoot. The slower, more methodical, more mechanical, older school, precise and tactile shooting that comes with a tech camera is part of the fun for me. As a profession it would be a point-of-question: you can't produce as many shots/day with a tech camera as a dSLR - so is the increased quality and flexibility and decreased time in front of the computer later worth it to your business? But as a hobby it's a very different question - in many ways who cares how many shots you can accomplish per day. The greater question is how good will those shots be (to you) and how much will you enjoy creating them at the time, and viewing/sharing them after the fact.

    Another way of saying this is that in professional photography the capture of the image is often reduced to a means to an end - the delivery of an image to a client who will pay for it. In hobby photography the journey - the process of capturing the image - is just as important as the process.

    Some hobbyists will prefer a camera which is the easiest to get an ok image. But to me that's like saying a hobby runner should forgo actually running the miles and just jump in their car and drive to the finish line. I prefer a camera which is more an extension of my body and allows me to interact with the landscape rather than just frame it up and snap a shot. I feel more involved in the making of the image with a tech camera than I do looking through a live-view on a 5DII and doing things like pan-and-stitch and focus stacking on the computer later on. Getting a great image on a tech camera is more challenging, more engaging, and is slower than with more automatic and general-purpose cameras, but that makes it very satisfying to me - the fact that it produces the best possible quality is just a bonus.

    Doug Peterson (e-mail Me)
    __________________

    Head of Technical Services, Capture Integration
    Phase One Partner of the Year
    Leaf, Leica, Cambo, Arca Swiss, Canon, Apple, Profoto, Broncolor, Eizo & More

    National: 877.217.9870 *| *Cell: 740.707.2183
    Newsletter | RSS Feed
    Buy Capture One 6 at 10% off
    Here is another opinion. For the OP, at least, before acquiring an Alpa and a set of lenses to go with it, I would urge him to try out the experience of shooting with a tech camera by taping off the viewfinder in his Canon 1ds and turning off the autofocus and the Live View. Take some photographs and ask yourself, would these photographs have been exceptional if only I had used sharper lenses? The answer to me is clear.
    An untethered tech camera suffers from a number of disadvantages as a platform for landscape work. No ability to precisely frame the composition, no ability to "see" the perspective of the lens by looking through the lens(and the wider the lens, the more difficult it is to "see" that way), no ability to focus through the lens, no autofocus, no internal metering. What do you gain? The use of slightly sharper lenses that give you the theoretical possibility of slightly sharper images, which is very difficult to achieve in the field, particularly if you want to shoot multiple frames for focus stacking. And really, how many images would you take with a Phase DF where you would say that one of your images would really have been compelling if only you had a bit more sharpness?

  31. #81
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    296
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    tech camera uses less batteries than 1ds

  32. #82
    Jim2
    Guest

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by hcubell View Post
    Here is another opinion. For the OP, at least, before acquiring an Alpa and a set of lenses to go with it, I would urge him to try out the experience of shooting with a tech camera by taping off the viewfinder in his Canon 1ds and turning off the autofocus and the Live View. Take some photographs and ask yourself, would these photographs have been exceptional if only I had used sharper lenses? The answer to me is clear.
    An untethered tech camera suffers from a number of disadvantages as a platform for landscape work. No ability to precisely frame the composition, no ability to "see" the perspective of the lens by looking through the lens(and the wider the lens, the more difficult it is to "see" that way), no ability to focus through the lens, no autofocus, no internal metering. What do you gain? The use of slightly sharper lenses that give you the theoretical possibility of slightly sharper images, which is very difficult to achieve in the field, particularly if you want to shoot multiple frames for focus stacking. And really, how many images would you take with a Phase DF where you would say that one of your images would really have been compelling if only you had a bit more sharpness?
    Sounds pretty sobering. Some of the things I am wondering about using Phase One + Arca rm3di:
    - Framing / composing - will I use live view or ground glass (yes for the reason you mentioned - the ability to see through the lens). It was suggested that the View Finder is really good but I am sceptical about its framing accuracy, in fact sure that it won't be accurate - the solution is take the shot, adjust, retake, review on back, adjust, repeat.

    - The usability in highly dusty and windy environment (slot canyons, dunes / desert with blowing sand, beaches with salt water vapour and sand blowing, misty waterfalls, slight rain). I remember while in the slot canyons and other sandy areas... my ears and nose were full of sand! Sand got into my 'weather sealed' canon L lens and a lot got onto the 1ds3 sensor too.

    - Related to the above: using ground glass whether it is by taking off the back and putting on GG and taking it off and putting the back on - or by using a sliding back - would make the sensor or the sliding back mechanism to catch those dust / salt water vapour etc. The only solution I think is to 'seal' the back onto the camera using some sort of duct tape, and use live view for composing and focusing. This is one thing that I am REALLY REALLY wondering about.

    I am starting to sound like a sour grape already

    Dropping 55K on a camera is very different to buying a luxury car. I know for sure that there won't be much going wrong with a luxury car and that almost everything about it will be a joy to experience.

    But yeah I might add P45+ into my consideration thanks!

  33. #83
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    My suggestion for what it is worth since you want to jump in to MF than I can offer this up since I have a lot of experience shooting ALL of the Phase backs. If you really want to go new and really want to use a tech cam than my immediate thought would be the IQ 140. Its a great step in with the new tech and you can really see what your doing shooting with a tech cam. I would also buy it as a package which you get a DF and a 80 for a few bucks more. Worth it to buy like that and you have a regular cam if the tech cam bugs you and you can go long. Lets get down to facts it is half the price of the 180 and with that savings you could buy a Alpa 3 lenses and still have change left over.

    2 things can happen . You hate a tech cam , very easy to sell a Alpa STC on this forum with the 3 lenses if all turns to hell in a hand basket and you don't like shooting this way. A lot of folks don't as it maybe too slow with working with it. Trust me I have taught 14 workshops and I see everything. Second regardless your still in MF with the 140 the latest tech with a DF and 80 which you can build on for not too much money buying lenses.

    3rd I added one you actually have 2 separate systems sharing the same back which gives you many shooting options.

    Okay now for the down and dirty order it today through one of our site sponsors with DF and 80 and you get a P40+ DF and 80 today to use until the 140 is delivered. Double check with your dealer on this. If you do the math at the end of the day you may just have two complete systems with several lenses for each and still have change in your pocket plus you get the tech which is the same tech as the 180 just in a smaller package. Now you have to take my word for this the P40 sensor will blow anything away in 35mm PERIOD. I have had the P25+,P30+ and P40+ with 16k in actuations on it. Nothing comes close except for the 60 and 80 mpx sensors and also there is ZERO difference between the P65 and P40 except sensor size and more detail of course. Lets add another dimension here have you priced a Alpa system out . 3 lenses and a STC will hit you for about 15k . Really need to put pen to paper and get the math done. Now not to say do not buy the 180 which is freaking awesome BTW. I have shot it twice now and pretty extensively as a Prototype and it smokes anything out there.

    First do the math than buy whatever YOUR comfortable with. If you go wrong it may not be as big as a issue since everything you bought is the latest tech and much easier to sell. I'm a Phase shooter and i tried them all and there is not one back I would not recommend given the shooting style. Obviously tech cam stay away from the P30+ since it has micro lenses. All the IQ's will be fine so take your pick but just because a 180 is twice the price of the 140 does not mean it is twice as good. You really paying for the making of larger chips which is expensive. Sure it is better no question but how much money do you want to throw out to find out.

    Now for the real brass tax. I'm a 35 year working Pro and when it comes to buying gear I leave my bloody ego at the door and let my practical side speak( and i am the biggest gear slut here). You do NOT have to have the absolute best as your neighbor, it will not make you any better than anyone with less expensive gear. I teach workshops and our attendees have better gear than me. And good for them and happy they do but it means nothing in the field unless it actually helps make the process of shooting better. The IQ will do that especially with a tech cam. It will with a DF also as you can confirm everything your doing. Do NOT get caught up in having the most expensive gear will make you better, your wasting your money thinking that but getting stuff that works and frees your mind is a good thing. Starting out I believe the IQ will be extremely helpful.
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  34. #84
    Jim2
    Guest

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by jbaxendell View Post
    If you have not done so already, reckon on spending a substantial amount on a workstation, monitor, printer, colour management system, tripod + head etc. This forum and the Mac Performance Guide will show you how to drop a lot of money on the peripherals ;-)
    Yep!

    Mac Pro: 7-9K
    Eizo monitor: 5.5K
    i1 Pro: 3.5K
    24" printer (no doubt high MP will mean bigger printer): 4K
    Ink: 1K per set for refill
    Roll Paper.....
    Tripod: 0.8K
    Head: 1.7K
    travel expenses: 6-8K/month (motel, car rental, fuel, food) - multiply this by 5-6 per year: 48K/year
    travel tickets: 2K per trip on average (long haul, inter-continental flights)
    Photography "workshops": $2-6K / workshop
    Other sundry expenses: xxxx

    Probably add:
    disto meter: 0.5K
    value added warranty: 4K (for phase one)
    Insurance for the camera: (haven't asked yet)

  35. #85
    Jim2
    Guest

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Mancuso View Post
    My suggestion for what it is worth since you want to jump in to MF than I can offer this up since I have a lot of experience shooting ALL of the Phase backs. If you really want to go new and really want to use a tech cam than my immediate thought would be the IQ 140.
    ..... removed for brevity....
    Do NOT get caught up in having the most expensive gear will make you better, your wasting your money thinking that but getting stuff that works and frees your mind is a good thing. Starting out I believe the IQ will be extremely helpful.
    Guy, I think Phase One should hire you as their sales manager! (imagine all the perks that come with it.... think free use of IQ180!!!) I am being sincere here - you pose a very compelling argument!
    Last edited by Jim2; 13th April 2011 at 06:58.

  36. #86
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    LOL I am available, my wife would love for me to have a real job. I know I am very good at this stuff and they should hire me but I do believe in the product and that is number one for me. I help a lot of folks as well as Jack does and we take our advice and suggestions very seriously as we always want to be honest and help folks. We both get a lot of e-mails and PM's on this everyday and neither one of us makes a nickel on it. But seriously I would not mind having a job with them. Anyone listening. LOL
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  37. #87
    Senior Member stephengilbert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Santa Monica, CA
    Posts
    2,272
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Forget sales manager; hire Guy to come along on your photo trips, point out what you want photographed, and voila: photos.

    It'll save a ton of money, and you'll have someone to drink with.

  38. #88
    Jim2
    Guest

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by stephengilbert View Post
    Forget sales manager; hire Guy to come along on your photo trips, point out what you want photographed, and voila: photos.
    LOL LOL LOL!!!!!!

  39. #89
    Workshop Member lance_schad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Phila./NY
    Posts
    1,146
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    19

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by stephengilbert View Post
    Forget sales manager; hire Guy to come along on your photo trips, point out what you want photographed, and voila: photos.

    It'll save a ton of money, and you'll have someone to drink with.
    I have been thinking the same thing. Guy could travel with you , with his equipment, teach you while your shooting together, help with your post processing and output. Then after a while when your comfortable you can purchase a system. Not a bad idea.

    L
    LANCE SCHAD - Digital Transitions - Phase One,Mamiya | Leaf,Arca-Swiss,Cambo, Profoto
    direct/cell:610-496-5586 office:877-367-8537x224
    http://www.digitaltransitions.com email:[email protected]

  40. #90
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  41. #91
    Sr. Administrator Jack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Altos, CA
    Posts
    10,486
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    1031

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    The reality is this: If you're a hobbyist, you can only justify expenses relative to the intangibles you gain from immersing yourself in said hobby. If it relieves stress, it may lengthen your life and make you more enjoyable to be around -- how much is that worth in dollars? If it eliminates the need for you to visit a psychoanalyst that charges $400/hour every week, then it may pay for itself over time. Also, high end camera gear is not usually a "sunk" cost -- it usually retains some value should you decide to bail. (Some gear, or exceptionally good copies of lenses, can even increase in value!) OTOH, if it's going to mostly sit in the closet while you only talk about it in an online forum, then you probably ought to look for another hobby!

    Of course my vote is get all that gear, then come on a workshop to learn how to use it!

    Jack
    home: www.getdpi.com

    "Perfection is not attainable. But if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."

  42. #92
    Jim2
    Guest

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Maybe I should go check out Pentax 645D vs Phaseone P40+ threads. Maybe for a hobbyist, a Pentax 645D is good enough, gives me the pleasure of taking photos and ability to print big-ish, either way, a significant step up in quality from 1ds3........... and at $15-$20K (with lenses) - relatively a pocket change compared to P40+, rm3di and lenses (28K). I guess I need to think through the lenses combinations here.

    The advantage of pentax being its weather sealing, great battery life, hand holdability, a lot less 'surprises'/unknowns (to me) than Phase system. Except that I'll have to use auto focus instead of manual focusing that I'm used to. eeek!

    .....still thinking...............

  43. #93
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    1,083
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    6

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    And why don't you add Hasselblad H4D option there? there is also Leica S2 if this will not suit you as well, i may understand why Phase One, but if you added Pentax 645D then you better add other MF brands, in fact i think you should think about Phase One vs. Hasselblad more than P1 vs. Pentax.

    Good luck!
    Tareq

  44. #94
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Well i think the song changed here. Where we not talking about a tech cam. If that is the case than it is either Leaf, Phase or Hassy. The Pentax and S2 are not candidates for a tech cam.
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  45. #95
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Warks, UK
    Posts
    550
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Mancuso View Post
    Well i think the song changed here. Where we not talking about a tech cam. If that is the case than it is either Leaf, Phase or Hassy. The Pentax and S2 are not candidates for a tech cam.
    ...yes, if you want movements, then a tech cam is the real thing, with movements for all lenses - even if you have to have a different tech cam, or WA bellows or whatever for Ultra-wide angles.

    ¿does no-one else want movements on 200mm lenses?

  46. #96
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    142
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Would you feel better spending half as much on a system and the other half on philanthropy?

  47. #97
    Super Duper
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Royal Oak, MI and Palm Harbor, FL
    Posts
    8,498
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    44

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Quote Originally Posted by Guy Mancuso View Post
    Well i think the song changed here. Where we not talking about a tech cam. If that is the case than it is either Leaf, Phase or Hassy. The Pentax and S2 are not candidates for a tech cam.
    Here's something appropriate to this discussion ... should be the mascot image for the MFD forum ...

    If you don't have the Chedda, ya can't buy something betta.

    (I first shot this with a S2 and 120 Macro lens BUT couldn't get enough DOF to get it all in focus without moving back ... so I shot it again with a H4D/60 and HTS tilt-shift adapter and 100/2.2 with a 13mm extension tube @ f/41 and it's all in focus without moving back or cropping to fill the frame. That's my version of a "Tech Camera" these days Take it off, and it's a regular camera again.

    Frankly, if I were going 100% pure tech camera, I wouldn't even consider anything but a Phase One IQ ...

    -Marc

  48. #98
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    I agree Marc the IQ is the king of the road for a tech cam. It actually answers the real question of the day. Did I get it and that is the one everyone walks away from taking there shot ask. Those little clouds that pop off your head like hope I nailed the focus, I hope i was square, i hope I shot what I thought I was shooting. I know all the tech cam folks are going YUP
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

  49. #99
    Super Duper
    Senior Member
    Godfrey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Near San Jose, California
    Posts
    7,928
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Just read through the whole thread again.

    On reflection, I think the answer is much like the response given a customer who asked the price in a Ferrari dealership, "If you have to ask the question, you shouldn't buy the car."

  50. #100
    Administrator, Instructor Guy Mancuso's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23,623
    Post Thanks / Like
    Images
    2555

    Re: Is buying a 55K camera justifiable... in the name of hobby?

    Marc can I borrow that C note to ad to my o' **** upgrade piggy bank
    Photography is all about experimentation and without it you will never learn art.

    www.guymancusophotography.com

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •