Just a quick note about moderation.
Being a moderator is indeed a hard - and often thankless - job. But, it's also a position of power in a community. Some people enjoy helping as moderators for the best of the communities they moderate, others enjoy being moderators for the power that comes with it.
Moderators, in my view, should be there to ensure civil proceedings in a forum, not to take sides or rule on the matter of an argument.
Some of DPR forums had great moderators overall, some forums had a mixed bag of good / not so good moderators. Often, in case of what I perceived as not-so-good or unfair moderation, going "one level up" helped solve - temporarily or permanently - issues that what I perceived as a not-so-good moderator wouldn't be able - or willing - to solve.
In decades of forum experience (DPR among them, and dozens of others), I noticed that when moderators (again, on DPR and elsewhere) are also very active people in that same forum, things often go downhill in terms of the objectivity and fairness (so to speak) of the moderation.
Perhaps choosing moderators "cross forums", meaning e.g. having had a DPR forum member active in the Medium Format forum moderate the B&W forum, or any forum where they didn't post as much, or at all, would be a better move to ensure fairness, rather than having someone with "stakes in the game" in terms of the arguments they should moderate, moderate the game itself. Just my .02.
Best regards,
Vieri