k-hawinkler
Well-known member
Distant Rain
50S + GF63
50S + GF63
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Jim Kasson on DPReview quantified that a while ago.While reading Chambers blog about the 100s he mentioned, between rants, that there is shutter shake and resulting image degradation when using any shutter configuration other than ES. I thought I would see what I could see and shot my 138 float with the ES followed by EF - tripod mounted with 2 second delay. I brought the images into C1 and it took 200% pixel peeping but I finally saw a difference. Very subtle but it's there. It would never stop me from shooting with EF which I have needed in windy conditions.
Victor B.
None of this matters for real work.While reading Chambers blog about the 100s he mentioned, between rants, that there is shutter shake and resulting image degradation when using any shutter configuration other than ES. I thought I would see what I could see and shot my 138 float with the ES followed by EF - tripod mounted with 2 second delay. I brought the images into C1 and it took 200% pixel peeping but I finally saw a difference. Very subtle but it's there. It would never stop me from shooting with EF which I have needed in windy conditions.
Victor B.
Victor
It seems he takes extreme situations with much of his work. I would never take an image up 5 shots from a -3 stop exposure or whatever he does. I can only guess same here with his EF rant. I cannot wonder if he has set up something wrong. I will see next week!
Thanks for the feedback, much appreciaterd.This last shot is sensational!........hope they did'nt slip.........
Thanks again....That's a wall hanger, that cropped one......at the top of the stairs about 24x36 inches........
Great shots K-H. I've witnessed the same scene at an iconic waterfall overlook. Here the betrothed stand at the edge of the overlook with the falls as a background for the entwined couple.Thanks again.
BTW from where the folks are standing down to the Rio Grande river that’s a straight 1,000 foot drop.
thanks Carl. Great image and story.Great shots K-H. I've witnessed the same scene at an iconic waterfall overlook. Here the betrothed stand at the edge of the overlook with the falls as a background for the entwined couple. .
Thanks again Lou for parting with that great lens. I am really enjoying it a lot.K-H
Glad to see that 63 of mine you have put to extraordinarily good use.
Only for JPG. Raw is Raw.... only one size. But when I travel I use a recipe in C1 to spit out 50MP image tiffs which makes my laptop work much faster once in PS.Victor
RE 100S Image sizes. I see on p104 of the manual you can select different sizes like where L=11658x8736 in 4:3 for 102MP and M=8256x6192 in 4:3 for 52MP, but it is not clear to me if this represents RAW images. I am not interested in jpegs as I plan to record RAW to both cards (as a form of backup) and switch to ACROS on the EVF when I want to see a composition in B&W.
Can you shed any light on this? Thanks.
Lou