Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
You're right, and it should have been rectified herelove the colors...but have to say, either make the horizon level or don't; then you are making another kind of statement. So far your shots have all been off level a bit, but I'm getting the feeling that was an accident, not an intention
Thanks, it's interesting to compare digital to MF film.Beautiful! And a very nice portrait too.
¿So how can "professionals" get away with using Canons?H1 + 80mm @ 2.8 + Portra 160
For comparison / reference: Canon 1Ds3 - 85L @ 2.8 + ISO 100
Yes, very interesting indeed. But which result best represents (color, etc.) what you see with your eyes?Thanks, it's interesting to compare digital to MF film.
Good point, but obviously it works for many, many photographers and their clients.¿So how can "professionals" get away with using Canons?
¿Do they think that this blurring effect is flattering, or minimised post-production?
Excellent comparison (and beautiful portraits, particularly the MF/film one). What strikes me immediately is how the MF/film portrait jumps out of my monitor and etches itself into my graphic memory. With more DOF, the Canon portrait may or may not be closer to reality with regards to colours etc., but is that what I am looking for in portrait photography?The 1ds3 image is straight out of the camera apart from white balance correction and cropping.
For me the comparison was for the detail which is why I'm moving to MF.
I've never had any complaints about the 45+ weddings a year I do with my 1Ds3 either.
Haven't posted any images for a while. Here's a few from last night.
IQ180 with 75-150
Really like the stones Wayne. Where were these shots taken? The red stone (upper) appears to be a well-worn brick.Haven't posted any images for a while. Here's a few from last night.
IQ180 with 75-150
My girlfriend (without knowing the different camera) prefers the Canon image.¿So how can "professionals" get away with using Canons?
¿Do they think that this blurring effect is flattering, or minimised post-production?