Striking; I think it works very well. Hong Kong? I hope that's fog.Hmm, not sure if this works at all or not.
Tom
Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Striking; I think it works very well. Hong Kong? I hope that's fog.Hmm, not sure if this works at all or not.
+1I liked it as is to be honest.
Very nice Woody but theres this weird white stuff in your pictures that I hope not to see much of this year and nextThe day after. Same setup. The IQ 180's dynamic range gets a workout.
Blimey... that must have been a helluva party! Great shot!Went for a trip into the desert today:
Made a new friend:
Here you can see what they were eating:
I prefer the second. Is it x100?This is the kind of Fun With Filters Frenzy that only happens when Sundays and Blue Moons coincide...
Most evenings I walk my pooch at dusk and there's this one spot where the colours make a pot of gold under some trees. It makes me stop in my tracks every time but it always looks like it's the sort of scene that's better in memory than on film. However... I started off with an iPhone snap processed in Snapspeed, quite liked the result and then graduated through a Fuji X100 shot to a full on, three shot HDR with IQ180 on Cambo with 35XL, LCC, the works, then processed in C1 to export to LR, then out to Nik HDR then Color Effex Pro and back to Lightroom.
So here are the three shots. If anyone likes them, which do they prefer: the $500 version, the $1,000 version or the, well, let's just say stratospheric version! You could save me a lot of money here...
That first one especially is great - a lovely thing for her to have when she's older!I know we had allready quite a bit fall color here but anyways:
#3This is the kind of Fun With Filters Frenzy that only happens when Sundays and Blue Moons coincide...
Most evenings I walk my pooch at dusk and there's this one spot where the colours make a pot of gold under some trees. It makes me stop in my tracks every time but it always looks like it's the sort of scene that's better in memory than on film. However... I started off with an iPhone snap processed in Snapspeed, quite liked the result and then graduated through a Fuji X100 shot to a full on, three shot HDR with IQ180 on Cambo with 35XL, LCC, the works, then processed in C1 to export to LR, then out to Nik HDR then Color Effex Pro and back to Lightroom.
So here are the three shots. If anyone likes them, which do they prefer: the $500 version, the $1,000 version or the, well, let's just say stratospheric version! You could save me a lot of money here...
I like both #3 and #1, in that order, although for different reasons. #3 has a precision I attempt to achieve in my own photography; it's an accurate record. #1 is more nebulous, imprecise and dream-like; more of a memory.This is the kind of Fun With Filters Frenzy that only happens when Sundays and Blue Moons coincide...
Here is my question: I voted for #2 because I find there are more colors in the leaves. Specially some yellowish while in #3 it looks all dark orange/red to me.This is the kind of Fun With Filters Frenzy that only happens when Sundays and Blue Moons coincide...
Most evenings I walk my pooch at dusk and there's this one spot where the colours make a pot of gold under some trees. It makes me stop in my tracks every time but it always looks like it's the sort of scene that's better in memory than on film. However... I started off with an iPhone snap processed in Snapspeed, quite liked the result and then graduated through a Fuji X100 shot to a full on, three shot HDR with IQ180 on Cambo with 35XL, LCC, the works, then processed in C1 to export to LR, then out to Nik HDR then Color Effex Pro and back to Lightroom.
So here are the three shots. If anyone likes them, which do they prefer: the $500 version, the $1,000 version or the, well, let's just say stratospheric version! You could save me a lot of money here...
I guess I should have said why I liked #3 best.Here is my question: I voted for #2 because I find there are more colors in the leaves. Specially some yellowish while in #3 it looks all dark orange/red to me.
So was #3 some days later and therefore less yellow leaves?
or did you post process in a way that you wanted it to look different to achieve a certain effect/ more color contrast to the dark green?
or did the x100 render the different colors better?
Yes, but such a nice postcard. Really makes me want to load up the canoe and head out. For some reason, I associate the golden tamaracks with the warm, insect-free days of fall, i.e. perfect; maybe I just don't notice them when the weather is bad.............(Yeah, I know it's pure picture postcard stuff!)
Bill