Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
Looks like he unterminated the review...and edited his previous post without acknowledging the previous termination. Not helping his reputation on certain forums....Diglloyd as he terminates his X-Pro1 review:
"It [X-Pro1] has some fine qualities, but it is simply too frustrating to work with its images, not one of which has anything approaching the sharpness of what should be there with a 16MP camera."
Maybe he should take a look at this thread...
Agree! Here you need that color!Teera - wow. Incredible detail. Color seems to suit the shots. Nice!
Where did he post ?Looks like he unterminated the review...and edited his previous post without acknowledging the previous termination. Not helping his reputation on certain forums....
And this: "The Fuji X-Pro1 pixel quality at ISO 200 is extremely impressive. I deem it superior to the full-frame Canon 5D Mark III at ISO 100."
Well I'm sure Mr. Lloyd knows his stuff, but I've been very impressed with the images shown here. Yeah, we are all waiting for RAW file support from Adobe, Capture One and so forth to discover what the quality of the RAW files really look like. I just wish Capture One supported camera profiles made with ColorChecker and that Fuji and other camera manufacturers could support DNG format like Leica and Pentax; we could then use a common metric for RAW IQ comparison.Diglloyd as he terminates his X-Pro1 review:
"It [X-Pro1] has some fine qualities, but it is simply too frustrating to work with its images, not one of which has anything approaching the sharpness of what should be there with a 16MP camera."
Maybe he should take a look at this thread...
Wow... excellent! Which temple is that?Thanks Terry, scho and ustein. I edited mostly with LR basic functions. Except this one which seems a bit bland so I added skylight filter and tonal contrast from a demo color efex pro 4.
At iso 2500, no noise reduction in pp.
I respect Lloyd Chamber's reviews (I'm a subscriber too) but sometimes there's an element of KR in them ...Looks like he unterminated the review...and edited his previous post without acknowledging the previous termination. Not helping his reputation on certain forums....
And this: "The Fuji X-Pro1 pixel quality at ISO 200 is extremely impressive. I deem it superior to the full-frame Canon 5D Mark III at ISO 100." Not bad for sharpness unbecoming of a 16MP camera.
I had missed the fact that the X-Pro 1 offers square format - really good feature. You get square frame lines in the OVF (though I don't know how accurate they would be) and the EVF shows a square. Can't say for non native lenses, though I imagine the EVF at least would show a square. Maybe somebody could confirmWould it be practical to use the X-Pro 1 as a square format camera with the CV12 lens? if you shoot in 1:1 format with the CV12 or other non-Fuji lens (via an adapter), will the the EVF show square frame lines?
Congrats - another one bites the dust :grin:I succumbed. It was only a matter of time. I picked up the camera this afternoon and after charging the battery, headed to the North Shore to catch sunset.
The first two shots are A-A (auto). I thought it would be a little smarter; f/16, 1/1200, 800 ISO.
R