Great to see you here. Join our insightful photographic forum today and start tapping into a huge wealth of photographic knowledge. Completing our simple registration process will allow you to gain access to exclusive content, add your own topics and posts, share your work and connect with other members through your own private inbox! And don’t forget to say hi!
This was a reply, to me.An older digital back doesn’t develop fat pixels and create that unique fat pixel look just because newer models have even thinner/smaller pixels.
Perhaps start a thread for images from CCD sensor backs of all types. That would showcase images from a sensor technology that has a unique look in it’s own right.
Wow ! Very cool image.Hasselblad 553ELX, 60mm f/3.5 CF, Kodak DCS Pro Back Plus
Hello GaryWhether you like it or not, ~9 microns (or larger) was the criteria when this thread was created.
Nice image !... 22mp is plenty enough as long as you do not need to print billboards.
Very nice indeed, your fat pixel picture makes me want to go and find a bottle of this liqueur ...Fat pixel backs are not dead yet!